Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/2002 NFL Expansion Draft
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by User:Matthewedwards 19:38, 28 October 2008 [1].
2002 NFL Expansion Draft[edit]
previous FLC (03:30, 13 October 2008)
This article was archived although every reasonable critique was being promptly addressed. I resubmitted it to keep it in the process. User:2008Olympianchitchatseemywork 08:01, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 18:53, 13 October 2008 (UTC) [reply]This was the last open item that was posted less than 24 hours before the list was closed:
"The 2002 National Football League Expansion Draft was the start of the Houston Texans new National Football League (NFL) team." Now that you've put the subject at the beginning, the sentence is not grammatically correct. For starters, "Texans" should have an apostrophe after it. How was the draft "the start" of the team? Dabomb87 (talk) 14:25, 12 October 2008 (UTC)Dabomb87 (talk) 14:25, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Done The sentence is grammatically fixed and does not reference the draft as the start of the team.--User:2008Olympianchitchatseemywork 08:01, 13 October 2008 (UTC) More comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)[reply]
"If a second player is taken, the existing team could then pull back its remaining two players." "is"-->was.
Done--User:2008Olympianchitchatseemywork 18:07, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
External Links should be External links.- Ok, I am stuck on this one. One of these videos is the only source for the statement that there were 25 Pro Bowlers available to the Texans, and that the draft was coverred live in ESPN. Another commentator asked for them to be moved to an External Links section, so I did so. Please advise. --User:2008Olympianchitchatseemywork 18:07, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Done Oh, ok, lol.--User:2008Olympianchitchatseemywork 18:47, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"To become competitive with existing teams, the league had awarded the Texans the first pick in the 2002 NFL Draft and had given them the opportunity to select current players from existing teams." It sounds like the sentence is saying that the league is trying to become competitive with other teams.Dabomb87 (talk) 14:34, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- What makes http://football.about.com/library/weekly/bl_expansiondraft.htm a reliable source?
Done Removed as a source.
- Ref #6 is missing publisher info.
Done Removed as a source.
- What makes YouTube videos reliable?
Done The video are the original ESPN broadcasts of the draft itself. I noted that.
- Why is Pro Football Weekly italicized in some references, but not others?
It is based on a difference between how cite news and cite web function. Two of the sources are originally from their website, and one is from their print publication that was then reprinted on the web.
- It's still on a website, so is there any way to make it consistent? –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 18:52, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Done After looking at the citation formats, I realized that where I was using the "publisher" entry on some, I should have been using the "work" entry. I fixed all references to refer to the actual work from which the reference was found, and noted them as a website if such, so as to distinguish between Pro Football Weekly and the Pro Football Weekly website, for example. The two newspaper articles were actually in the paper, not just on the papers' websites, so I left them just as the paper's names without the website notation. I hope this is satisfactory.--User:2008Olympianchitchatseemywork 05:39, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Otherwise, sources look good. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 16:53, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Review
- On October 6, 1999, in Atlanta, NFL owners had unanimously voted to award the 32nd NFL franchise and the 2004 Super Bowl to the city of Houston, Texas. - link to Atlanta, Georgia.
Done linked.--User:2008Olympianchitchatseemywork 00:15, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The draft was covered live on ESPN,[11][12] and the Texans drafted nineteen players. - how about The draft was broadcasted live on ESPN,
Done Thanks, it's more accurate that way.--User:2008Olympianchitchatseemywork 00:15, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This sentence stands out, it should be organized more like the 2008 WWE Draft.
- Which sentence?--User:2008Olympianchitchatseemywork 00:15, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Done I changed that sentence to more closely track the one in that article.--User:2008Olympianchitchatseemywork 07:20, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- To me the colors in the name columns of the table is distracting and should just be in a regular color.--SRX 23:54, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Support - my comment about changing the sentence about it's broadcast was never addressed but it's not major, so It can't prevent it from meeting WP:WIAFL.--SRX 13:59, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Done I thought I had fixed it, but I think this is what you wanted? "The draft took place live and aired on ESPN." The sentence on 2008 WWE Draft reads: "The Draft took place live and aired for three hours on the USA Network." I don't know how long this draft was,but the rest of the sentence is almost verbatim from the other article.--User:2008Olympianchitchatseemywork 21:43, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.