Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/81st Academy Awards/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by The Rambling Man 17:00, 11 July, 2013 [1].

81st Academy Awards

81st Academy Awards (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

• Featured list candidates/81st Academy Awards/archive1

Nominator(s): Birdienest81 (talk) 21:09, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

I am nominating the 2009 Oscars for featured list because I believe it has great potential to become a Featured List. I read the requirements and criteria. I also followed how the 1st Academy Awards, 82nd Academy Awards, and 84th Academy Awards were written. Birdienest81 (talk) 21:09, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Resolved comments from Underneath-it-All

;Comments: "nominations were The Curious Case of Benjamin Button. with thirteen" → removed the period after the film title "Slumdog Millionaire with ten" → add period at the end of the sentence Ref 4 → write dates in a similar style To keep everything uniform add (AMPAS) to all Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences refs. Also, format them in a similar manner. Ex: Ref 1 = Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences (AMPAS)...while...ref. 18 = Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences. AMPAS. Add Amazon.com as publisher for Box Office Mojo. Box Office Mojo is listed twice in ref. 42 Same with refs 6 + 51 (TVbytheNumbers or TV by the Numbers) Ref 58 links to an E! article, not The Philippine Star – Underneath-it-All (talk) 21:35, 7 June 2013 (UTC) Fixed: I have fixed everything you requested. -Birdienest81 (talk) 23:11, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

• Support – Underneath-it-All (talk) 18:43, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Resolved comments from Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 03:35, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

*The second paragraph (On February 7, 2009,...) is too short (at least in my computer I see a line and two words). It should be expanded or merged. "The telecast attracted nearly 37 million viewers (in North America)." -> The paragraphs are not needed. "followed by Slumdog Millionaire with ten. [12]" -> " ten.[12]" "curiosity the the awards," -> typo "Gabriel still attended the ceremony. John Legend performed the song in place of Gabriel, backed by the Soweto Gospel Choir" -> Not necessary but I'd reword it as "Gabriel still attended the ceremony but John Legend, backed by the Soweto Gospel Choir, performed the song in place of Gabriel." "previous year's ceremony" -> Link it Ref 49 "The Los Angeles Time" -> Los Angeles Time, per consistency. Box Office Mojo should not be in italics Spotcheck not done, but refs look good. Tbhotch.™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 23:58, 8 June 2013 (UTC) Fixed: I have fixed everything you requested. -Birdienest81 (talk) 22:12, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

• Support Also, I forgot it. The poster should look like this or this with its rationale and license. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 03:35, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Done: I changed the rationale and license to your request.

-Birdienest81 (talk) 05:49, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 16:41, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Comments Once you abbreviate AMPAS, use it. No need to make Oscars bold. "The ceremony was televised in the United States by ABC. Actor Hugh Jackman hosted the ceremony for the first time" consider merging to avoid repetition and short sentences. "and WALL-E with one" full stop required. Is the Jess Cagle in the infobox (who isn't linked) the same as Jess Cagle? All the nominees were announced in a single minute (at 5:38 a.m?) Do we really need such precision? I would imagine the day would suffice, the nearest minute seems irrelevant to me. nominations[13]), -> nominations),[13] Normally don't use WP:BOLD to depict something, it may be hard for accessibility. We often use a symbol to denote winners (as well as colour or some other more visual cue), but perhaps here it's not so bad because you've said the winner is denoted first. The image captions could use a bit of expansion, e.g. what they won their awards for. Where is Jerry Lewis' award cited? "Three: The Curious Case of Benjamin Button (film)|The Curious Case of Benjamin Button" format problem here. Per WP:COLLAPSE should you really be collapsing those tables automatically? "12.43 rating over a 32.61 share among the 18–49 demographic" means nothing to people outside the US, please link or explain. Chicago Sun Times is Chicago Sun-Times. Huffington Post is The Huffington Post. Consistency in references with author names, is it First name Surname or Surname, First name? Typo in ref 44. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:35, 14 June 2013 (UTC) Fixed: I have fixed almost everything with some notations Format is surname first, then first name. Wikilinked Nielsen ratings which has an explanations on ratings and shares. I think the bold lettering for the winners works because on my iPod touch which does not indent the winner making it seem like no winner is denoted. -Birdienest81 (talk) 05:22, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

• Why isn't there a table for multiple wins and nominations? Nergaal (talk) 05:27, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Done: I added a table for multiple wins and nominations.Birdienest81 (talk) 03:12, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

• Support. However, I suggest archiving other online sources with webcitation.org, to manually archive all online references which will guarantee they remain accessible even if the site goes down: (this page (step-by-step instructions there). SoapFan12 02:06, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

• I'm in the process of doing so. It might take awhile though.Birdienest81 (talk) 03:12, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Resolved comments from Giants2008 (Talk) 21:26, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Comments – Winners and nominees: No need for two Slumdog Millionaire links in the written section. Per the Manual of Style, we aren't supposed to be highlighting table entries in bold. Perhaps it would be possible to only have the winners be italicized? That seems like the easiest possible fix that retains highlighting in some form. Multiple nominations and awards: The Dutchess should have its link piped so the parenthetical part (which isn't part of the title) doesn't show up. In Memoriam: Should the first word of "in Memoriam" be capitalized? Also, the comma after "tribute" should be removed. See also: The first link isn't needed, since the 2008 in film article is linked in the lead. Note A: Commas needed after "daughter", and before and after "actress Michelle Williams". Giants2008 (Talk) 22:41, 5 July 2013 (UTC) Fixed: I have fixed everything you requested. Winners are now denoted with a double dagger placed at the end of recipient. -Birdienest81 (talk) 23:34, 5 July 2013 (UTC) Presenters: Double word in "Presenters of the the Romance 2008 montage". This one's still in the article, I'm afraid. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:26, 6 July 2013 (UTC) -Fixed': Removed the extra 'the' -Birdienest81 (talk) 17:57, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.