Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Ed, Edd n Eddy specials/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was archived by SchroCat 12:14, 15 October 2014 [1].
Ed, Edd n Eddy specials[edit]
Ed, Edd n Eddy specials (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): Khanassassin ☪ 15:47, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
While too short for a FA nomination, I feel that the content given is reliably sourced, well-written and properly formatted; franky, that it meets the FL criteria. Khanassassin ☪ 15:47, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose per 3.b I was quite curious about this topic but when I opened the article got disappointed. 4 items do not make a FL, and you could easily have a simple para in the episodes list detaining the extra info here. If you really want to go with a separate article, then I strongly suggest to make this a GA/FA with little or no tables at all. You can have a common Dev section, Rec, etc, and perhaps separate Plot sections. Nergaal (talk) 11:49, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose on criterion 3.b. This could theoretically be worked up to, at least, a GA article. It doesn't make sense as a stand-alone list. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:51, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. – SchroCat (talk) 12:34, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.