Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Frequent David Lynch collaborators/archive1

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 17:08, 23 October 2012 [1].

List of frequent David Lynch collaborators[edit]

List of frequent David Lynch collaborators (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Nominator(s): GRAPPLE X 00:29, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bit of an odd one, this. I took the mess that this was and applied a bit of neatness and sense to it, hopefully it works. If anyone's wondering about the change from 2+ projects to 3+, that was simply as going by 2 collaborations threw up a lot of "false positives" with those who had reprised their Twin Peaks role in Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me, but nothing else beyond that. That seemed a bit counter-productive, so I felt raising the bar to three was the best option, as it also has the benefit of implying a genuine continued working relationship. I'll be on hand to answer any concerns quite readily, but from the 15th to the 19th I'll be away from any computers so any responses made in that time will be answered that weekend when I'm back. I promise I'll put the man away again for a while when this one's over. GRAPPLE X 00:29, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from TBrandley (talk) 15:44, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • centre should be center since this article is related to an American person
    Got it, good catch. GRAPPLE X 23:16, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Add plainrowheaders to all of the table's coding for MOS:BOLD and WP:ACCESS
    I've left bold headings in the key deliberately; I tried it with plainrowheaders and found that it was not clear enough at a glance given how brief the abbreviations are. I think the bolding makes it easier to flick back and forth between the key and table when necessary, and shouldn't cause much issue given that this isn't a table really designed for navigation of content. GRAPPLE X 23:16, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Watch for redundancies that make the article too wordy instead of being crisp and concise"
    Uh huh. I'll give the article another read through then, I guess. GRAPPLE X 23:16, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    That issue was bot-generated. No worries if there's nothing. TBrandley 23:19, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TBrandley 22:58, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support TBrandley 15:44, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support based on my previous (non-formal) review of the article. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:00, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question - what or where is the definition of the inclusion criteria for this list? The Rambling Man (talk) 21:22, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's the very last sentence in the lead; it lists anyone who has worked with Lynch on three or more projects throughout his career. My rationale for going with three is listed above. GRAPPLE X 21:28, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Aha. I'm not sure about the title of the list. "Frequent" being "three or more" is a little odd to me. But then, it's hard to think of an alternative... The Rambling Man (talk) 21:37, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"Recurring"? GRAPPLE X 21:46, 12 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
For info Great work as always, Grapple! I'm sure you're aware of the book "The Complete Lynch" by David Hughes (ISBN 9780753-505984). It has a breakdown of each of Lynch's works, with each film having a section titled "Lynch mob" which details recurring people in Lynch's works. Lugnuts And the horse 10:29, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
That sounds really useful. Is the list missing anything that's mentioned in the book? If not, I might still look into it just to keep the refs neater ({{sfn}} refs are a lot easier read than two dozen web cites). GRAPPLE X 12:34, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it's not a bad book (he's also done the same book for Kubrick too). The edition I have is from 2001 and included Mulholland Drive, albeit only 4 pages of coverage (Lost Highway, for example, has 20 pages). Each film typically has the following sections: Cast, Title sequence, Summary, Source, Production history, Casting, The Lynch mob, Quotes, Sound & music, Influenced by, Legacy, Deja-vu, Themes, Cut scenes, Poster, Trailer, What the papers said, Box office, Controversy, Trivia, Apocrypha, Availability, Final analysis, Expert witness and Lynch on X.

For Lost Highway, the Lynch Mob section details Scott Coffey and Jack Nance. For the behind the camera crew it states the following:

"Behind the camera, there were many more familiar faces. In addtion to co-screenwriter Barry Gifford, the crew included producer and unit production manager Deepak Nayar (second assistant director on Wild at Heart, first assistant director on Fire Walk With Me, producer of On the Air and Hotel Room), Fire Walk With Me editor Mary Sweeney, cinematographer Peter Deming (On the Air, Hotel Room, Premonitions Following and Evil Deed), production and costume designer Patricia Norris (The Elephant Man onwards), casting director Johanna Ray (Blue Velvet onwards) and composser Angelo Badalamenti (Blue Velvet onwards). Eric DaRae, who had played Leo Johnson in Twin Peaks and Fire Walk With Me, is also credited, as a "buyer/swing"."

Comprehensive to say the least. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 13:54, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly seems so. I'll work on adding Nayar now; given that Da Re seems to straddle the three-role minimum in both cast and crew departments, how would you think it would be best reflected in the list? I don't know if a third table would be worth adding, or if perhaps just adding in prose only the Lost Highway role where his acting appearances are already mentioned. What pages are being used for this, though, just in case I can't find it online? If I can't find a version available to view I can still put a book cite together so long as I know the page ref. GRAPPLE X 04:06, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Have added the source and used it to add Nayar. GRAPPLE X 20:54, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Very interesting and original article. My only concern is, shouldn't the article be titled List of frequent David Lynch collaborators? Zac (talk · contribs) 19:45, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks for your support. Like I say above, I'm open to a name change. Not sure "List of" is entirely necessary (see Chief Mouser to the Cabinet Office or Buchanan Medal for others without it) but if it seems like it would work better than I'm fine with that. What do you think of the suggestion to change "frequent" to "recurring", mentioned above? GRAPPLE X 19:52, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    No problem. Oops! I didn't notice that! Those examples are quite different than this article. This is a type of article that would require a List of in its title. I don't know what "recurring", it sounds a bit odd in the title. I think "frequent" works fine, as they, simply, work frequently with him. Zac (talk · contribs) 20:44, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Fair enough; have moved it to List of frequent David Lynch collaborators. GRAPPLE X 21:01, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    Good. Just letting you know, I was inspired. Zac (talk · contribs) 21:22, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/Frequent_David_Lynch_collaborators/archive1&oldid=1138480108"