Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/IWGP World Tag Team Championship/archive1
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
IWGP World Tag Team Championship[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page. The closing editor's comments were: 11 days, 5 support, 0 oppose. Promote. Sephiroth BCR 23:14, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for Featured List status because I think it fits all of the criteria. I believe it to be an important, comprehensive, and well-sourced list. GaryColemanFan (talk) 05:31, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The box is overlapping with the table. Can you fix this? Miranda 05:45, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I've fixed it. --MarcK 11:06, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - Good enough sources and format. The Chronic 04:29, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - Well sourced. -- LAX 11:09, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Support - but one thing is unreferenced: "There have been a total of 44 recognized individual champions and 37 recognized teams, who have had a combined 50 official reigns." You really need to find a source for that statement. Davnel03 19:28, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- No it doesn't. The list itself is the source, and the list is sourced. -- Scorpion0422 01:32, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak OpposeSupport: There are a couple of issues that, IMO, would make this a better list:- Because of the Infobox, the table is pushed down and there's a *ton* of white-space following the TOC. I think the Infobox should go and/or be shortened quite a bit.
- The first four columns (Wrestlers, Times, Date and Location) could all be sortable.
- IMO, the Notes column doesn't have to be small-font. Since there's a lot of text there, it should be readable :)
- References *could* be done in two columns, but not necessary.
- -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 01:16, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for your feedback. I will address your concerns tomorrow when I have a few minutes. GaryColemanFan (talk) 04:59, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- All issues have been addressed - looks much better! Thanks for all your work! -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 16:38, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for your feedback. I will address your concerns tomorrow when I have a few minutes. GaryColemanFan (talk) 04:59, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I thought is was standard to keep the notes section under small text (based on the other WP:PW lists). The Chronic 22:50, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]