Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Leuchtenberg Gallery/archive2

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 10:01, 6 May 2013 (UTC) [1].[reply]

Leuchtenberg Gallery[edit]

Nominator(s): Fram (talk) 10:23, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Leuchtenberg Gallery/archive1 was closed at the request of a reviewer because it had taken too long and there had been too many changes between the start and the finish. At the time of closing, the FLC had received one support, no opposes, and many constructive comments, so this restart of the FLC is not a way to dismiss opposes or something similar. Fram (talk) 10:23, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support. I'm sure more images of the works can be found and added meanwhile, but I'm not waiting for that to give my thumbs up. The only thing that bugs me (though not impeditive of my general approval) is that extra image of "The Three Graces" at the top, which adds nothing that the one in the list does not... but that could be just me. Parutakupiu (talk) 21:52, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support it was and is a featured list. --Tomcat (7) 09:21, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Agree with Parutakupiu comment about the image at the top. I just have one concern: Why is the column "Current location" empty for most works, while it says unknown for some? P. S. Burton (talk) 20:56, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- "Unknown is where I have a source that states it is unknown (similar with "lost"). Empty is "I couldn't find any information on it". Fram (talk) 07:35, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.