Note: this nomination started on June 25, 2006 -- RuneWelsh | ταλκ 14:45, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Has been a great list for my time at Wikipedia. Is regularly updated with the correct information. Jasrocks(talk)
Comment - Sources should be cited with {{cite web}}. And what is HS and what is the asterisk for? Some footnotes explaining the meaning of the fields would be great. Apart from that, it seems good, despite the fact that I never saw a cricket match in my life. Afonso Silva 17:33, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Concerns hopefully addressed. Sam Vimes 21:17, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support - An image would make it look a little better, but that's no big deal. It seems to meet the criteria. One more thing, in other similar lists the most recent players are in the top, in others don't, a standard would be great, but anyway, nice work. Afonso Silva 21:26, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support, although I'd like to see at least a national flag, as it's been done in some other cricket lists. -- RuneWelsh | ταλκ 12:35, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
