Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Cleveland Indians Opening Day starting pitchers/archive1
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by The Rambling Man 18:38, 27 December 2012 [1].
List of Cleveland Indians Opening Day starting pitchers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Astros4477 (talk) 16:31, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because... I feel it meets FLC and matches similar Featured Lists such as List of Chicago Cubs Opening Day starting pitchers and List of Baltimore Orioles Opening Day starting pitchers. Astros4477 (talk) 16:31, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from NapHit (talk) 13:47, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
I'm aware of what a home run is, its the sentence as a whole that makes no sense. I don't understand what a 3run home run means, 3 home runs in a row? Its not clear. What is gave up referring to? Why did the player give it up? To the layman its not clear. Its certainly a simple sentence if you understand baseball jargon, but for someone who doesn't its troublesome, hence why I mentioned it. NapHit (talk) 14:40, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
NapHit (talk) 17:02, 31 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
NapHit (talk) 13:47, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support NapHit (talk) 01:25, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from TBrandley (talk) 22:26, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
|
- Support TBrandley 22:33, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 17:06, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Quick comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 18:59, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
Resolved comments from Bloom6132 (talk) 13:42, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments –
|
- Support – meets all 6 criteria. Great work! —Bloom6132 (talk) 13:42, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Giants2008 (Talk) 22:02, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments –
|
Resolved comments from Harrias |
---|
Just a couple of comments from me, but for the most part this looks like a very good list.
I would use colour and the double dagger, that should satisfy the concerns. NapHit (talk) 13:37, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
|
- The fourth sentence includes a lot of nice information that seems tangential at best, and at worst completely unimportant for the rest of the article: they might be about the Cleveland Indians, but does any of the information really have any bearing on the Opening Day starting pitchers?
- I think you mean paragraph. I wasn't sure but this information is in other Opening Day starting pitcher Featured Lists.--Astros4477 (talk) 21:45, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support now that access concerns have been met. Harrias talk 07:45, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - I don't vote on ACCESS criteria, so no complaints there. I'd go with italics and a double-dagger, not color, though. I'd also like to see the sentence bit "which includes the Opening Day starting pitchers from the Bluebirds and the Naps" changed to something that references that those were prior names for the team- I assumed that was what you meant, but it wasn't obvious since you'd never mentioned those names prior. The issue is not enough to withhold my support, however. Consider archiving your references so that if Retrosheet or Baseball Reference ever go down or radically change their site you don't lose all of your citations- I can give further instructions if needed. --PresN 04:29, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not too familiar on how to do that but I don't really think that's needed. It's always been stable. Also, I don't think color should be used either, I think there would be too much.--Astros4477 (talk) 05:24, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- As long as you use the double dagger I'm not going to make a fuss.NapHit (talk) 11:46, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree, italics and a double dagger would be sufficient for me. Harrias talk 12:05, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I have added a double-dagger to the home games. I think all the comments have been addressed.--Astros4477 (talk) 17:45, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree, italics and a double dagger would be sufficient for me. Harrias talk 12:05, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- As long as you use the double dagger I'm not going to make a fuss.NapHit (talk) 11:46, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not too familiar on how to do that but I don't really think that's needed. It's always been stable. Also, I don't think color should be used either, I think there would be too much.--Astros4477 (talk) 05:24, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.