Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Kashimashi episodes/Archive 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

List of Kashimashi episodes[edit]

After some work to bring the quality of this list up, I have checked the criteria and similar featured lists in WP:Anime, such as List of Planetes episodes and List of Oh My Goddess episodes and believe it satisfies the critera.-- 08:31, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose per excessive use of fair use images and tiny lead. Renata 21:19, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Invalid objection if you're just counting images per article rather than looking at the amount of the work used. --GunnarRene 19:55, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Thought those two points would come up. The same could be said at List of Oh My Goddess episodes yet it is a featured list. I could incorperate History into the lead, but as far as excessive fair use goes, List of Oh My Goddess episodes and List of Planetes episodes have many more fair use images than this one.-- 21:54, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Tiny two line lead (criterion #3), and the images lack the "alt" text demanded by criterion #2a. (I agree with Renata over the excessive use of fair use images). Tompw (talk) 22:24, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment About the "alt" text thing, the template the episodes resides in does not allow captions or alt text to be shown, so there is no way to go about doing that. And fine then, I'll incorperate History into the lead. And again, I bring up the point that this list has much less fair use images than other lists that are already featured lists. You're double talking if you think you can just ignore those other articles.-- 22:30, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
      • I've requested an edit to {{Japanese episode list}} (which is protected) to allow "alt" text, which hopefully won't take long. The lead is much improved. Tompw (talk) 12:34, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
        • I just looked at the talk page of the template, and I had no idea we could do that as that perameter is not shown in the useage section of the talk page. I'll incorperate it now.-- 20:27, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment, I looked over the Featured List criteria, and there is nothing about excessive fair use preventing a list from becoming featured. How do you explain opposing this list on that basis? Everything else has been dealt with; there is nothing keeping this list from becoming featured.-- 08:45, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per non-excessive usage of fair use imagery. Matthew 08:56, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per lack of copyediting. Images are fine.--GunnarRene 13:36, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment I just performed a copyedit on the list and fixed the obvious spelling errors I missed. I also reworeded some things and added a bit of info to a couple of episodes.-- 15:29, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]