Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Medal of Honor recipients for World War I/archive3
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by The Rambling Man 18:18, 12 September 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because I previously submitted it twice and it failed and after making a number of edits and major changes to the article I believe that I have (along with help from others) made all the necesary changes to get this article to featured status. Kumioko (talk) 17:26, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There's a large space in the second footnote. I would fix it, but I don't go near footnotes (I tried to put one in once, and I was up all night trying to put it in. Not fun.) Mm40 (talk)
- I don;t see any space. --Kumioko (talk) 06:12, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I performed a quick copy-edit of the lead. The article is much improved from when it was previously at FLC. However, I want to see other users' opinions first before supporting. Dabomb87 (talk) 19:26, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks --Kumioko (talk) 06:12, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support I believe this is a featured list.--Cheetah (talk) 03:06, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, see below for reasoning.
Woody's resolved issues
|
---|
|
- Excellent work. I have struck the resolved issues with only the double recipients outstanding. That isn't a deal-breaker for me but I do think there should be some explanation on the page. By the way, I have removed the note about quotations as there aren't any quotations left. Regards, Woody (talk) 10:38, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks, I added to the lead about the double recipients. — jwillbur 19:20, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks good, I have no outstanding issues. Great work, Woody (talk) 23:50, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks, I added to the lead about the double recipients. — jwillbur 19:20, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Kumioko has effectively retired. Per his comment here, this FLC can be closed or taken up by somebody else. Does anybody want to work on the issues raised? Dabomb87 (talk) 04:23, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm going to try to address the issues, might take me a few days. — jwillbur 07:03, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support My issues were resolved in the previous FLCs, and I'm satisfied that the list meets FL criteria after Woody's and Crzycheetah's concerns were resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:46, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:18, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Some inline book references use harvnb, while others don't. Make them consistent please.Dabomb87 (talk) 00:48, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Done, I think. Is this what you meant? — jwillbur 01:21, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- That's the one, thanks! Dabomb87 (talk) 02:18, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.