Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Memorial Cup champions/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by The Rambling Man 08:15, 24 February 2010 [1].
- Nominator(s): Resolute 16:48, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Toolbox |
---|
A list I worked on some time ago but failed to nominate at that time. There are a few redlinks for some of the oldest teams, which I do not believe should be a problem but can fix if desired. Fun Fact: My grandfather played in the 1953 tournament, and that team was recently honoured by the Manitoba Hockey Hall of Fame. Resolute 16:48, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This is a WikiCup nomination. To the nominator: if you do not intend to submit this article at the WikiCup, feel free to remove this notice. Mm40 (talk) 13:04, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments - Just wondering why are the Host Locations very inconsistent? for example the "1919 to 1971" table has no locations linked, and "1972 to 1982" has them linked and "1983 to present" doesn't even have the column, plus on a personal opinion the Abbreviations would create some type of confusion with the readers as I would expect some may not know that Alberta is abbreviated AB (just an example I would expect them to not be familiar with the other regions as well). Afro (Its More Than a Feeling) - Afkatk 22:32, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Umm, yeah. That was a bit of a miss on my part. ;) I've changed the first two tables to be consistent - using just city names and linking only the first usage. From 1983 on, the host city was de-emphasized in favour of the host team, which is noted in italics. Resolute 01:14, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Musta accidentally looked over the Italics part. and I would think overlinking the host city column wouldn't be a bad thing and would remain consistent with the table as after all the Team names are linked multiple times. Afro (Its More Than a Feeling) - Afkatk 01:29, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Duly overlinked. :) Resolute 00:12, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - It all seems fine. Afro (Its More Than a Feeling) - Afkatk 23:02, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Duly overlinked. :) Resolute 00:12, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Musta accidentally looked over the Italics part. and I would think overlinking the host city column wouldn't be a bad thing and would remain consistent with the table as after all the Team names are linked multiple times. Afro (Its More Than a Feeling) - Afkatk 01:29, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Umm, yeah. That was a bit of a miss on my part. ;) I've changed the first two tables to be consistent - using just city names and linking only the first usage. From 1983 on, the host city was de-emphasized in favour of the host team, which is noted in italics. Resolute 01:14, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Dabs; please check the disambiguation links identified in the toolbox. Dabomb87 (talk) 04:16, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Blah... fixed! Resolute 06:47, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:38, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved issues, Dabomb87 (talk) |
---|
Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)
|
- Quick comment: I think the "score" column should go between the winner & runner up columns, similar to what is done at List of Grey Cup champions. -- Scorpion0422 19:04, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Not a bad idea. Updated. Resolute 00:07, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comments Support –
1983 to present: "they had been defeated by Spokane Chiefs in the WHL playoffs." Add "the" after "by".Note b: "The Chicoutimi Sagueneens hosted the 1988 tournament at the Colisee de Chicotimi, however were not guaranteed a vote." Not in love with the grammar here. Merely switching "however" to "but" is the fastest way to improve it.In the first table, the score is sorting improperly. The double-digit scores are sorting in a different group than the single-digit scores. I think the figures need sort templates.Giants2008 (27 and counting) 22:32, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- All three fixed... I hate sortable tables, lol. Resolute 00:07, 4 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 08:16, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 18:50, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
Resolved comments from Truco
|
---|
Comments from Truco (talk · contribs)
|
- Support--Truco 503 02:48, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Hidden category: