Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Naruto: Shippuden episodes/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by The Rambling Man via FACBot (talk) 00:31, 12 April 2017 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of Naruto: Shippuden episodes[edit]

Featured list candidates/List of Naruto: Shippuden episodes/archive1

Nominator(s): MCMLXXXIX 23:46, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because IMO, it's suitable to be one. I have made major tweaks to it so that could be the case. If you notice something wrong, please bring it to my attention. Thanks. MCMLXXXIX 23:46, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Aoba47

References 26, 29, 12, 24, 18, 25, 17, 30, 19, 20, 22, 15, 5, 23, 21, 14, 42, 43, 13, 46, 60, 62, and 64 are dead and either need to be archived or replaced with new links.
The image at the top needs an ALT description.
Is this sentence really necessary (Viz had stated the English dub would be released sometime in the near future.) as the release date for the English dub is stated in the next sentence?
You use the phrase “made and broadcast” twice in close proximity; I would suggest having some more variety for this.

@1989: Great job with this list. I will support this after my comments are addressed. Good luck with getting this promoted. Aoba47 (talk) 01:52, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Aoba47: Done MCMLXXXIX 04:37, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Everything looks good to me. Good luck with this list. If possible, could you look at my FAC? Hope you have a wonderful rest of your day. Aoba47 (talk) 05:43, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Aoba47: Quick question, did you just give the source review? MCMLXXXIX 14:54, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@1989: Unfortunately, I do not think that I am experienced enough to do a source review. I also think it would be better to get a new perspective and have a separate user not already involved in the review do it instead. I can say that the Bibliography needs to be revised to remove the error message pertaining to the "|duplicate_archiveurl=" and the "|duplicate_archivedate=". Also, make sure not to SHOUT in your reference titles (putting reference names in ALL CAPS) as done in References 1, 2, 5, and 6. I apologize for not being more help on this. Aoba47 (talk) 14:59, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done That duplicate thing, I don't know what happened there. I noticed bot edits were made after my changes for some reason. Thanks for your feedback. MCMLXXXIX 15:17, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anytime! The same thing has happened to me several times in the past so I completely understand. Aoba47 (talk) 15:33, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Tintor2

Some parts appear to be referenced like "Episodes 1 through 53 were broadcast in 4:3 standard definition fullscreen, while episodes 54 onward were aired in 16:9 widescreen." and some tables that mention the DVDs like the ones from UK. I'm pretty sure "amazon.co.uk" could be used.Tintor2 (talk) 16:25, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Tintor2: Done MCMLXXXIX 20:04, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support.Tintor2 (talk) 20:24, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, one comment. The list lacks a small premise that could be used in the lead like "It follows the ninja teenager Naruto Uzumaki and his allies in their fights against the criminal organization Akatsuki who wish to obtain nine creatures known as the "Tailed Beasts ".Tintor2 (talk) 00:53, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done MCMLXXXIX 01:05, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Source review by ProtoDrake

Maybe not necessary, but an FA requires all links to be archived, so I think it would be wise to archive them. It will take some time, so it's not urgent to this review.
All the XtraVision links are registering as dead on Checklinks.
The Amazon links all redirect. They need updating.
Refs 3, 9, 10 and 13 lack publishers. Several other links also lack links for publisher/work that have articles on Wikipedia.

That's what I can find and see immediately. I'll do a more thorough look through at a later date once the major issues are dealt with. --ProtoDrake (talk) 15:07, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@ProtoDrake: Done ~~I plan to archive everything soon.~~ MCMLXXXIX 11:40, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

After looking through and rechecking with Checklinks, I think that (provided the archiving does happen eventually) I'll Pass this on the source review. --ProtoDrake (talk) 14:12, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by AffeL

Support. Everything looks good, I can't seem to find any problems with this article other than to archive all the sources. - AffeL (talk) 13:25, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@AffeL: Thanks! I also have an FAC request open. Could you review it when you get a chance? MCMLXXXIX 13:30, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support I've come a bit late, but I don't see any problems with this so it should be good to go. JAGUAR 14:08, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: is there a reason why the sources for the English air dates end on November 5, 2011? Eddie891 (talk) 12:08, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Eddie891: That was the last episode that aired on Disney XD. MCMLXXXIX 12:22, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK then, Support Eddie891 (talk) 14:07, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support: The list looks good. I used to watch Naruto a lot, but lost track of it along the way during the initial stages of Naruto Shippuden. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 08:11, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment loads of quick supports, I'll do a review in due course. The Rambling Man (talk) 22:11, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@The Rambling Man: ? -- MCMLXXXIX 15:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, sorry, I'll get to it this weekend. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:32, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 18:38, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose with comments:

"Naruto: Shippuden is an anime..." please don't start with a redirect.
"adapted from Part II for Masashi Kishimoto's manga series" you mean from part II of...
"It is set after two and a half years" seriously? after after?
"against the criminal organization Akatsuki who wish to obtain nine creatures known as the Tailed Beasts" why? who cares?
"In 2008, Viz Media and Crunchyroll began providing eight English subtitled Naruto: Shippuden episodes on the official Naruto website every week until it caught up to the Japanese anime." really odd. This article needs a proper copyedit from native English speakers and anime experts (combined).

I could go on, but this is a list of lists, and such cases, the prose element has to be excellent for me to even consider a support. I am really concerned with the swiftness of support votes, that's something we'll need to look into. The Rambling Man (talk) 22:06, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: I fixed your issues, and re-did the lead. About the list of lists, an editor has been restoring revisions to an earlier point by seasons and that caused my changes to be removed. MCMLXXXIX 23:04, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: Did I resolve your issues? -- MCMLXXXIX 13:19, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@The Rambling Man: ? 1989 18:03, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. The Rambling Man (talk) 23:31, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.