Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Roman Emperors/archive3

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was not promoted 22:16, 23 January 2008.

---

List of Roman Emperors

Previous FLC

Back in March this was a Featured list candidate but did not suceed because of a lack of images. Back in May I added a full list of images and now it should pass as a featured list.--Uga Man (talk) UGA MAN FOR PRESIDENT 2008 22:50, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

• Oppose Definitely a good start, but as someone without much knowledge of Roman history, the list confuses me to no end. There's so many uncommon words floating around, most of which apply directly to the topic at hand, that they beg for explanation. For instance, what is a Principate, an Imperial name, a Dominate, Becoming Emperor, etc? Some other things that confuse me: why are some columns in a different font? Why does the notes section jump back and forth between these fonts? Why are there only 3 emperors during the Year of the four emperors? Why do all three emperors have "See:Year of the four emperors" in the notes column when it's already at the top of the subsection? Why are various cells in the reign column split up into to to say "From ###"? That info belongs in other columns. Why are Common Name & Birthplace in the same column? I could go on. Alot of this you could chalk up to ignorance on my part, but anyone should be able to read this list and understand what's going on, not just someone already familiar with the topic. One suggestion I have is to add some prose explaining each era briefly, specifically how it applies to the emperors of the time. As it is it's just a list out of context. Drewcifer (talk) 02:35, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

• comment The reign dates for the first table are properly sized for reading; the reign dates for the other tables are much too small to read. Hmains (talk) 00:16, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.