Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Saskatchewan premiers/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

List of Saskatchewan premiers[edit]

  • Self-nom - A complete and actuate list with an introduction, references, and all premiers' names, parties, photos, dates, assemblies, elections, and ridings. --Arctic Gnome 16:30, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support as one of the other contributers. Although, Arctic Gnome did a lot more than I did (I found a couple of photos and some dates). The list is complete, and on par with other Featured Lists (like List of Ontario premiers). -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 19:18, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Could you make a color key like the Quebec list has. It's probably easier for the reader. Jay32183 03:47, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral pending the licensing clarification regarding Image:Lorne Calvert.jpg, currently sitting smack-bang in the middle of the lead section. I'll re-evaluate it after that, but it looks fine so far (image sourcing/rationale for the rest of them I want to investigate further). Cheers, Daniel.Bryant 11:53, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support (signing properly this time) Tompw (talk) 11:39, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak support. I would say neutral, but some parts of the list are just magnificent, and therefore, I would say Weak Support to this list. It is factually accurate, alright. I am still looking for more images, and easier to navigate. The list seemed to be not completed yet, since the bottom row has no picture, not giving a complete idea of the whole list. Nonetheless, the list is excellently created. By the way, the timeline is magnificent. --CSI or CIS 22:26, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. Could you fix the images. On my PC they are floating out of their celle and overlap each other. CG 09:22, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'd like to help, but I honestly don't know what's going on with your display. I've looked at the list in a few different browsers on both a mac and windows and it looks fine in all cases. Sorry, but I don't know what to do. --Arctic Gnome (talkcontribs) 19:08, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]