Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Surrey/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 16:21:41 17 May 2019 (UTC) [1].
List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Surrey (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Dudley Miles (talk) 14:34, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This is the latest in my lists of Sites of Special Scientific Interest and is in the same format as FLs such as List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Suffolk and List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Kent. Dudley Miles (talk) 14:34, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Bordering counties and local governments are irrelevant to SSSIs and are not needed here at all but if you're going to insist, they at least should not be the first paragraph. Start with the actual topic of the list.
- This information has been supplied in many SSSI lists by myself and others and has never previously been objected to. I prefer to stick to the generally accepted format, but I have moved the paragraph as you suggest. Dudley Miles (talk) 20:27, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Banstead Downs duplicates "scrub" and "which"
- Fixed. Dudley Miles (talk) 20:27, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Blackheath: scientific names are italicized
- Fixed. Dudley Miles (talk) 20:27, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Blindley Heath: "
arich flora"
- OED shows "a rich flora" as correct. Dudley Miles (talk) 20:27, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Reywas92Talk 19:18, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Many thanks for your review. Dudley Miles (talk) 20:27, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- No other major issues then. Support Reywas92Talk 19:19, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 09:58, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
Otherwise, and as usual, excellent. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:18, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support my concerns addressed. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:58, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- I fixed a typo and am now happy to support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:10, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 16:21, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.