Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of United States Naval Academy alumni (Legislators)
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Scorpion0422 21:57, 21 March 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because I think it meets the criteria. It is a full list of all US Naval Academy graduates who became legislators. It is the third in a set of four lists of USNA alumni. All images are free licensed. All entries have refs. I'm in WikiCup. — Rlevse • Talk • 02:08, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support — Excellent work. Well-cited, the images appear to have correct copyright information, and the topic appears to be complete. My only concern is that the title of the article gave me the impression that state legislators also would be included. Since this only includes U.S. federal legislators, might I suggest a title change to List of United States Naval Academy alumni (U.S. Legislators)? JKBrooks85 (talk) 05:00, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- You missed Roilo Golez who is listed. He's one of the foreign USNA alums and was a legislator in his native Philippines. I thought that something like (national level legislators) was awkard so just went with (Legislators). I've added "or its equivalent in their native country" to the first sentence of the second paragraph. — Rlevse • Talk • 11:06, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Works for me. JKBrooks85 (talk) 23:30, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- You missed Roilo Golez who is listed. He's one of the foreign USNA alums and was a legislator in his native Philippines. I thought that something like (national level legislators) was awkard so just went with (Legislators). I've added "or its equivalent in their native country" to the first sentence of the second paragraph. — Rlevse • Talk • 11:06, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Truco
|
---|
Comments from Truco (talk · contribs)
|
- Support -- Previous issues found in review have been resolved to meet WP:WIAFL standards.--₮RUCӨ 15:32, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:46, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved issues, Dabomb87 (talk) |
---|
Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs) I feel like I've reviewed this list before :); I am finding less to fix.
General comment Is there some kind of navbox that you can make for the four USNA lists? It would be better to have than to list the other USNA lists in the See also section. Dabomb87 (talk) 12:45, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:46, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The web title in ref 32 needs to be converted to title case, even if the original title was in all caps.Dabomb87 (talk) 12:43, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed. — Rlevse • Talk • 22:26, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I'm wondering if the references for specific statements should go in the notability section after the corresponding sentence. It might be more useful because if you want the source that confirms that Jeremiah Denton was a Rear Admiral, there are four to choose from. -- Scorpion0422 21:01, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- None of the other USNA alum lists are done like that and wouldn't it be defeating the purpose of a refs column? I guess it's not a huge deal but for me I like the format and consistency of all refs in the refs column. — Rlevse • Talk • 21:08, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I always thought that the refs column was more for when the entire row was covered by once source and there was nowhere else to put it. I suppose you are right though. This is unrelated (so you can reply on my talk page if you prefer), but I was wondering what you thought about my recent comments. -- Scorpion0422 21:12, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- None of the other USNA alum lists are done like that and wouldn't it be defeating the purpose of a refs column? I guess it's not a huge deal but for me I like the format and consistency of all refs in the refs column. — Rlevse • Talk • 21:08, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.