Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Victoria Cross recipients by campaign/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Matthewedwards 22:23, 11 August 2009 [1].
- Nominator(s): Woody (talk) 18:39, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Toolbox |
---|
The last one of the campaign series of VC lists. This brings together all of the lists into one in the same way that the nationality list does. It forks out those lists that don't fit into to the main list. All of the other lists bar the WWII one (which is at FLC) are FLs. I think this meets all the criteria and I have tried to take into account the issues encountered in previous FLCs. Thank you for your time, Woody (talk) 18:39, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 16:40, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
Good luck with this and then the topic. Please, please ping me when you list the topic at WP:FTC. Best regards. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:55, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support - good work. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:40, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 23:22, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved issues, Dabomb87 (talk) |
---|
Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)
|
Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:48, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - this is a well written and constructed list that meets the criteria. I do have two minor comments, however:
- There is some inconsistency with the presentation of access dates in the references section.
- Shouldn't Iraq War be listed instead of Operation Telic in regards to Johnson Beharry? On all of the other recipients listed they are recorded by war/campaign, rather than an operation within that conflict like Beharry.
Cheers, Abraham, B.S. (talk) 10:38, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorted, thanks for the review. Woody (talk) 11:58, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.