Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of World Heritage Sites in Brazil/archive1
Appearance
List of World Heritage Sites in Brazil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Tone 19:09, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Brazil has 24 WHS and 22 tentative sites. Some sites are very fresh and there's plenty of nature. Since the list for Argentina was my sole running nomination and just got promoted, I am adding a new one. Standard style. Tone 19:09, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Comments
[edit]- MPGuy2824
- "of the sugarcane industry".
- For "Ruins of Sao Miguel das Missoes (Brazil)" it would to add some info about the only site in Brazil along with the general info about all five missions.
- "centre of the sugar industry".
- "the Cathedral Basilica of Salvador, the Church and Convent of São Francisco, Salvador, and the Church of the Third Order of Mount Carmel."
- "The church, which is from the second half of the 18th century, is"
- " in the Italian-inspired Rococo style."
- is there a good wikilink for "ceramic-farmer societies"
- "the beach with a paving of hewn stones "
- "The park is located on the coast of the Maranhão State. It comprises a vast expanse of sandy dunes with temporary and permanent lagoons." -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:08, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed, thanks! As for the link, the most appropriate seems to be the Formative stage, but not ideal and may look like an Easter egg. Old-world equivalent would be Neolithic but that clearly does not apply to Brazil. Tone 18:51, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- ...continuing
- "only atoll in the South Atlantic".
- "The site was inscribed to the World Heritage List as the Brazilian Atlantic Islands"
- Use either "inscribed on" or "added to".
- Also, if this is already inscribed, then what is the change? -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:19, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed. This is one of the cases where a tentative site gets promoted in another nomination and they forgot to do the cleanup of the list ;) Happens every now and then. Tone 10:18, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Support -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:33, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- ...continuing
- Fixed, thanks! As for the link, the most appropriate seems to be the Formative stage, but not ideal and may look like an Easter egg. Old-world equivalent would be Neolithic but that clearly does not apply to Brazil. Tone 18:51, 14 August 2024 (UTC)