Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of World Heritage Sites in Russia/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 10 March 2022 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of World Heritage Sites in Russia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Tone 08:49, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Russia has 30 WH Sites, so this is the longest list so far (I may nominate Italy next, which is the longest ;) ). Style is standard. Portugal's list has already seen some support so I am adding a new nomination. There are probably some simple typos throughout the list that I didn't spot, feel free to fix them on the checking. Tone 08:49, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by RunningTiger123
[edit]- "First five sites" → "The first five sites"
- Expand link for Historic Centre of Saint Petersburg and Related Groups of Monuments from "Saint Petersburg" to "monuments of Saint Petersburg"
- "inscribed to the list"/"most recent inscription" – the word "inscribe" feels weird in this context; is there a better word that could be used?
- "during the World War II" → "during World War II"
- "seabirds, snow geese, a large walrus colony" → "seabirds, snow geese, and a large walrus colony"
- "Karst" should not be capitalized (two occurrences)
- "National park covers parts of the Kolyma Lowland and Yana-Indigirka Lowland." – sentence fragment, should be fixed
- Site names starting with "The" should sort by the first word after that, not by "The"
— RunningTiger123 (talk) 04:12, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @RunningTiger123: Fixed, thanks! As for the "The" sorting, UNESCO sorts them like that, see Italy for example. So, unless there is a strong policy in favor of this approach, I would leave it as it is. Let me know. --Tone 08:26, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Since the same sorting applies for Russia here, I'll let it stand. On a different note, that page seems to list a new site that was just added – Valley of the Kings of Tuva – so we should probably add that. But I'm fairly confident you can add that with no issues, so I'll go ahead and support. RunningTiger123 (talk) 16:33, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Wow, look at it, they added it when I was just about through the list, haha. I'll add it. Thanks for the support! --Tone 18:41, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Since the same sorting applies for Russia here, I'll let it stand. On a different note, that page seems to list a new site that was just added – Valley of the Kings of Tuva – so we should probably add that. But I'm fairly confident you can add that with no issues, so I'll go ahead and support. RunningTiger123 (talk) 16:33, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:57, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
;Comments
|
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:20, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by MWright96
[edit]- "in 1990." - perhaps add the month to the year the conference was held?
- " Three of these sites are located in the present-day Russian Federation (or Russia):" - Try not to start the sentences with a written number
- "Nineteen sites are cultural and eleven are natural. Four sites are transnational." - same query as above
That's all I have MWright96 (talk) 14:52, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @MWright96: Fixed, thank you! I left the one starting with four because saying "There are four..." would read forced. --Tone 14:59, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - Have no further issues MWright96 (talk) 19:14, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @MWright96: Fixed, thank you! I left the one starting with four because saying "There are four..." would read forced. --Tone 14:59, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Source review passed, promoting. --PresN 16:26, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.