Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Bob's Burgers/archive1

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 29 April 2021 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of awards and nominations received by Bob's Burgers[edit]

List of awards and nominations received by Bob's Burgers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Nominator(s): Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:47, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because I have updated the list to include past nominations, and have expanded the lead along with archiving sources. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 21:47, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments
@ChrisTheDude: All  Done. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 15:01, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Lead
  • Bob's Burgers: The Movie should only be mentioned if you anticipate including potential awards/nominations for it here (I wouldn't recommend it)
 Done Removed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:15, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • "season" instead of "production cycle" in the lead - more accessible, used in source, consistent with other show pages
 Done Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:15, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I count nine Outstanding Animated Program Emmy noms in the table but the lead says eight
 Done Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:15, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • You should note at the bottom of the lead or right above the table that the listed years refer to when the awards were presented
Is there another list with this included? Haven't heard of people asking for it so just wondering. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:15, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
List of awards and nominations received by 30 Rock has a note in the lead and Writers Guild of America Award for Television: Animation has one right above the table. The WGA article actually lists year of airing, not award. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 16:06, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Again, as mentioned below, the 30 Rock list might not be up to today's standards, and the articles I've mentioned that have reached FL didn't require a note. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 16:16, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
How about List of awards and nominations received by The Good Place, promoted in January with a footnote? Stepping away from consistency for a moment, would you disagree that a note could be helpful to readers? Firefangledfeathers (talk) 16:39, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Guess I wouldn't. Note has been added. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 16:43, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Table
  • Probably, all the Annie "Best..." awards should say Television instead of TV to reflect the Annie's official name, otherwise the 2019 Annie nom for The Bleakening should say TV instead of Television for consistency
 Done Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:34, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The 2013 Annie "Best..." award didn't have "/Broadcast" in the name (supported by your source and the Annie site)
 Done Removed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:34, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'd argue the Libera awards for the album are outside the scope of this list, otherwise
 Done Removed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:34, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • WGA awards don't seem to have reliable naming style but other wiki articles seem to have settled on "Writers Guild of America Award for Television: Animation"
Am I supposed to change it? "Television: Animation" doesn't tell a reader much more than "Best Television Writing in Animation". Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:34, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's a puzzler! A reader who hasn't run into your phrasing before might check the source and the wikilink to the WGA awards and question why neither contains "Best Writing..." Firefangledfeathers (talk) 16:06, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Changed to "Television: Animation" as seen in this article. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 16:16, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done per consistency with three currently promoted lists (for Better Call Saul, BoJack Horseman, and Brooklyn Nine-Nine). The example you gave was promoted in 2008, so I'm not sure if it's still reliable or up to today's standards. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:34, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough! Firefangledfeathers (talk) 16:06, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for all your hard work on this list! Firefangledfeathers (talk) 07:21, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Firefangledfeathers: I have responded to your suggestions. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 12:34, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Some Dude From North Carolina: I have responded to your responses. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 16:06, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Firefangledfeathers: I have responded to your responses. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 16:16, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Some Dude From North Carolina: Re:re:re:re:comments. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 16:39, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Firefangledfeathers: Re:re:re:re:re:comments. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 16:43, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Some Dude From North Carolina: Looks great! Feel free to collapse this section if you want.

Comments from Dank

  • Go Heels! (Not really relevant, but ...)
  • Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
  • FLC criteria:
  • 1. The prose is fine. The coding at the top of the table seems fine. I checked sorting on all columns and sampled the links in the table.
  • 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
  • 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
  • 3b. The UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present. I'm not good with sourcing on articles like this one, but the other reviewers and the source review are likely to catch any problems.
  • 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
  • 4. It is navigable.
  • 5. It meets style requirements. The one image can't be a copyright problem because it doesn't meet the "originality" test for copyright.
  • 6. It is stable.
  • Support. Well done. (I hope you'll drop by my plant list nominations every now and then, but they tend to be long, so don't sweat it.) - Dank (push to talk) 20:56, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 19:05, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/List_of_awards_and_nominations_received_by_Bob%27s_Burgers/archive1&oldid=1020422455"