Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Shane Warne/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 21:12, 21 October 2011 [1].
List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Shane Warne[edit]
List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Shane Warne (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): User:joesayers talk 02:30, 23 August 2011 (UTC), The Rambling Man (talk) 15:51, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe that it meets the FL criteria. It is also very similar to featured lists for Glenn McGrath and Muttiah Muralitharan. Thanks for your time. User:joesayers talk 02:30, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- You should change the symbols as they are not ACCESS-compliant. Replace the ♠ and * with the {{dagger}} and {{double-dagger}} templates (the symbols redirect there, so you can just put in the braces) and the corresponding alt text.
– HonorTheKing (talk) 22:25, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for thadvice and I have changed the symbols to the dagger and double dagger. If there is anything else please dont hesitate to let me know and I will change it. User:joesayers talk 08:50, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 18:35, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 15:28, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply] Done all above changes. Thanks for your time. User:joesayers talk 16:24, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
|
Comments
- "behind only Sri Lankan, Muttiah Muralitharan." remove only we've already established he is second so its not needed
- table fails WP:ACCESS see MOS:DTT for more information
- Is there any point in the ODI table being sortable when there is only one row?
NapHit (talk) 23:24, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I have made the changes regarding the comment "behind only Sri Lankan, Muttiah Muralitharan." and have also made the ODI table not sortable. In regard to the WP:ACCESS i'm afraid I have not had much experience in this area and would need more detailed instruction and direction in order to improve the accessibility of the tables. Thanks User:joesayers talk 01:25, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The MOS:DTT page should provide you with the information, if not just look at other lists that are up for nomination, they have the code in them. NapHit (talk) 12:11, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Harrias |
---|
* You link five-wicket haul twice in the first two sentences: only link the first use. You are also inconsistent, linking to "five-wicket haul" the first time and "five wicket haul" the second.
|
- Support looks good to me now. Harrias talk 21:37, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I am retiring from Wikipedia due to other commitments and I apologise for not finishing what I started but I think this could with a bit of work be a featured list. If anyone would like to take over the list the please do, it would be a sincere shame for it not to be completed. Thanks User:joesayers talk 01:05, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- That's a shame, I'm prepared to take it on and see it through. Harrias, if you could provide a comprehensive review, I'd be very grateful. I've addressed a few of your concerns already but I'd like to make sure it's perfect. Cheers. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:53, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Quick comments –
Don't need the comma after Sri Lankan in the first paragraph.A One Day International link would be nice.Giants2008 (27 and counting) 03:16, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Done both of those, thanks. The Rambling Man (talk) 23:06, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from —SpacemanSpiff 12:58, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments -- Just a few minor things (as the nom isn't available I was going to fix these myself, but as there are a couple of others working on the list, I'm not doing so).
|
Further comment -- the sorting for wickets column needs some cleaning: All the entries use {{sort|05132|w}}. This key structure was created to sort wickets based on runs conceded e.g. 5 wickets conceding 50 runs would be sorted as better than 5 wickets conceding 70 runs and so on. Since the key remains unchanged across entries the sort template has no impact as the real sort is happening only on the display w and is just increasing the load time on the edit window. Either it could be changed to—SpacemanSpiff 09:38, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]{{nts}}
or use the right sortkey structure: {{sort|ddrrr|w}} dd = wickets in two digits (5 = 05) and rrr = 200 - runs conceded. A similar concept can be applied for runs conceded too to show 70 runs conceded for 7 wickets as better than 70 for 5. ddrrr would be replaced by xxxtt where xxx = runs in 3 digits (80 = 080) and tt = 10-wickets taken.- Wow, I forgot to check that. Should be fixed now. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:19, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support All my comments have been addressed, no other concerns. —SpacemanSpiff 17:29, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Cheers, and thanks for your diligent review. I cannot believe I didn't check the sorting on this list. Perhaps I'm getting too old....!! The Rambling Man (talk) 17:56, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Stemonitis (talk) 09:57, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
I have two comments on what is basically a well-executed list...:
In order to move this clearly stagnating issue (not helped by the original commentator not returning!) on a bit, I've opted to make them all consistent, regardless of how they appear in the sources. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:16, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Okeydokey. As I said before, it wasn't done that way in the first place because that's not what the sources say. But we're done now. I haven't the energy to argue the toss over this any longer. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:02, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Stemonitis (talk) 09:57, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.