Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Michael Jackson videography/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Matthewedwards 01:50, 24 August 2009 [1].
Michael Jackson videography[edit]
- Featured list candidates/Michael Jackson videography/archive1
- Featured list candidates/Michael Jackson videography/archive2
- Featured list candidates/Michael Jackson videography/archive3
- Featured list candidates/Michael Jackson videography/archive4
- Featured list candidates/Michael Jackson videography/archive5
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe it now meets the FL criteria, having had a helpful peer review from User:Finetooth. Pyrrhus16 18:50, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved issues, Dabomb87 (talk) |
---|
Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs) Much improved.
|
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:46, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ref 64, there's a double period after the author's name.Spell out all abbreviations in the publishers.Dabomb87 (talk) 22:07, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note FLC is currently short of reviewers; please consider reviewing one or more on the nomination list if you have not already (this message is being posted to all running FLCs). Dabomb87 (talk) 23:23, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Truco
|
---|
|
- Oppose
- ""Beat It", "Billie Jean" and Thriller" - why are the first two non-italics and in quotes and the last in italics without quotes?
- The format was copied from the main Michael Jackson article. As the wikilinks for "Billie Jean" and "Beat It" were to the song articles, they are in quotes. Thriller was italicised because it links to the article on the film as opposed to the song. I've changed it to quotation marks for consistency. Pyrrhus16 19:16, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- "credited for transforming the music video into an art form and a promotional tool" by whom? Where's the reference for this please?
- Same comment for the next couple of claims - "new channel to fame", "made an enduring staple", "drew controversy"..
- "awarded Guinness World Records." why?
- "of the entertainer's other " - "of Jackson's other" is fine.
- "of the actor's feature" ditto.
- suggestive lyrics. [5] - remove space before cite.
- black artists. [6][7] - ditto.
- Why have a section 1.1 when there's no 1.2?
- "was considered too violent, and was later replaced with a music video set in Brazil" a little odd for me. It implies that a video set in Brazil wouldn't be too violent.
- "recognised" this is BritEng spelling, while the rest of the article appears to be USEng.
- "the most successful music video" can you quantify what you mean by "successful" here?
- I don't really know what the Guinness World Records definition of "success" is. I wouldn't really like to speculate on it. Pyrrhus16 19:16, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, so provide a directly referenced quotation please, as this will clearly remain ambiguous. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:35, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't really know what the Guinness World Records definition of "success" is. I wouldn't really like to speculate on it. Pyrrhus16 19:16, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- " the innovative music video " - who said it was innovative? Is that just your opinion?
- Certainly not sure I see the point of a single entry table for the Television appearances section.
- "Jackson has released..." implies he is still alive?
- DVDs section - the table is quite messy for me. Do you really need to repeat the IFPI, ARIA etc when each one could be covered by a suitable column heading?
- Ref 10 - 2 not 02...
- Shouldn't the ten-digit ISBN fields be consistent with hyphenation?
- The Rambling Man (talk) 18:09, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Happy to say this list is looking very good. All of my concerns have been addressed, so I'm happy to support. Drewcifer (talk) 16:44, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Drewcifer
|
---|
Now for some more meta-questions:
Drewcifer (talk) 09:54, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm glad to say this list is look very very good. I only have a few more comments:
|
- Question shouldn't #Music videos have a chart position peak column also? Nergaal (talk) 17:12, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.