Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Phil Collins discography/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was not promoted by The Rambling Man 19:35, 21 September 2009 [1].

Phil Collins discography

Nominator(s): Mister sparky (talk) 15:03, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because i have been doing alot of work on this article in the past week to improve its layout, formatting and content. Everything is now fully sourced and correct and i believe it is a good representation of the artists work. Mister sparky (talk) 15:03, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Good list, but mvdbase.com and imdb.com are not reliable sources, hence my oppose. There's a few other problems I see, but nothing major; the unreliable sources are the only big issues at the moment. Drewcifer (talk) 15:51, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hmmm i didnt think they would be :( its a real pain trying to find reliable enough sources for the videos. vh1 and mtv only have a handful posted on their sites but i'm struggling to find anymore. so if anyone could help out it would be great :) Mister sparky (talk) 17:26, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For the Disney videos, I know they use to be hosted on the website, or probably even on the DVD's. --Lightlowemon (talk) 07:41, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

yea i did look at the disney main site and the disney records site and couldnt find anything about the video directors :( thanks tho Mister sparky (talk) 12:52, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome, I checked my Brother Bear DVD and there was no info there. Sorry I can't be more help. --Lightlowemon (talk) 08:07, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Has Drewcifer been asked to revisit this FLC? Dabomb87 (talk) 12:42, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

has now :) Mister sparky (talk) 17:36, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You forgot to include the following videos:

have added the vhs/dvd releases. i know the refs need formatting, just testing their validity at the mo... :) Mister sparky (talk) 13:30, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments The lead is far too long. Can you cut it down to 3 or 4 paragraphs? Also, you don't need comments like "according to The Times". That's in the citation. Also, remove the bit in brackets about Billboard's Adult Contempory chart. The lead should summarise the article, not repeat the whole article in paragraph form. Ask a copyeditor to help. -- EA Swyer ^Talk _{Contributions} 18:52, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for your comments! the lead was a bit long so i have shortened in a bit, its much better now and have also given it a copy-edit. Mister sparky (talk) 23:21, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've given the lead a brief copy-edit. You might want a look through the manual of style at some point (yes, I knnow it's boring). By the way, "U.S." is standard, rather than "US". -- EA Swyer ^Talk _{Contributions} 00:15, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Ref 17 link is shown invalid, needs to be fixed. And don't references 22-31 need to be cited the way others are? (Not sure on this one). Suede67 (talk) 01:24, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

forgot about ref 17, fixed now. the other ones for the dvd's i have removed because looking at other FL's they don't need to have individual sources. thanks tho :) Mister sparky (talk) 03:01, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Suede67 (talk) 04:09, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.