Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Taylor Swift discography/archive2

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Dabomb87 02:18, 11 July 2010 [1].

Taylor Swift discography

Featured list removal candidates/Taylor Swift discography/archive1

Nominator(s): ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 00:37, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating Taylor Swift discography for featured list again because I feel that it meets all criteria needed to be a FL. It is sourced and well-organized. Last time, it was not listed and I think that was a mistake. Anyways, before there was a source that was questionable, Chartstats.com, and I have changed it to the official website of The Official Charts Company, Theofficialchartscompany.com. So, I think the article is more than ready to become a FL. ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 00:37, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad to see this list back here again. Its certainly good research work, and the lead looks good. Comments:

Resolved comments from liquidluck✽talk 06:57, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

*The RIAA citation still isn't working for me as it wasn't when I brought it up in the previous nom, but it was apparently just me then. As long as it works for others, I'm good with it.

It was not working for me either. It is now fixed. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 02:26, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Allmusic and Rolling Stone general refs are both dead.

As for the Allmusic ref. The problem seems to be that in the middle of the url, the character

Other than that, no issues that I see right off the bat. liquidluck✽talk 01:56, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is there was a reliable source stating which singles are promotional and which are not? If it is separate for each, you can add a reference next to the title of each song. Otherwise, I'd rather see them in "other charted songs"; I've certainly heard "Today Was a Fairytale" on the radio.

So have I but it is a promo single because it was not released as a CD single and only a digital single. For the references, Allmusic and previously Rolling Stone had all those songs listed as digital singles. Anyways, if it makes you feel any better, I verified them to make sure it wasn't just a mistake. I think adding a source to each song would be pointless. Then I would have to add a source for each studio album, live album, EP, and single. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 21:14, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Minor concern: Should Best Days of Your Life (video) and/or Online (song) (video), in which Swift appears but does not sing, be included? This is really more an issue for the discographies wikiproject/MOS than for you, so not a big concern. liquidluck✽talk 06:57, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What does MOS say about it? -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 21:14, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since guidelines don't say anything about it, and Swift (vocally), does not appear than I don't think it should be added. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 20:27, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 16:35, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

"released her the eponymous" remove the.

done

Also, you probably don't need to say Taylor Swift, just pipelink "eponymous album"

This is very minor, but I think the title should be included since an eponymous album could have been titled Taylor. Anyways, if it's that big of a deal, I'll remove it. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 22:43, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, no worries. The Rambling Man (talk) 06:10, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"charted on the top forty" in the top forty?

done

Not sure the infobox image needs a full stop in the caption.

done

Live albums + compilation albums would be better if the columns were the same width from table to table.

I don't understand. Mind explaining? -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 22:43, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Each column would look better the same width from table to table, so, for instance, the Notes columns are the same width in each table. The Rambling Man (talk) 06:10, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but I still don't understand. Can you give an example? -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 17:51, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not to worry. I wanted the columns of each table to be the same width from table to table, I can't really explain better, and it's not mandated, so no oppose. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:35, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"The latter found its peak..." perhaps "The latter peaked..."

done

Where is "I Heart ?" referenced if it didn't chart in any territory?

In the main references. Allmusic lists it as a digital single release. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 22:43, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. The Rambling Man (talk) 06:10, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notes - if the number where it's charting is above ten, then use numbers.

Why? -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 22:44, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MOSNUM. The Rambling Man (talk) 06:10, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I read it and the way it is now is also acceptable. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 17:48, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Rambling Man (talk) 18:48, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 14:54, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

*Comment:

- "The discography of American country music recording artist Taylor Swift, consists of two studio albums," I'd reword for consistency with other lists as follows: The discography of Taylor Swift, an American country music recording artist, consists of..
  - Done
- "and number one Top Country Albums,[2]" if you mean it made it to number one, then reword (was number one on the Top Country Albums)
  - Done

Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 03:36, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 14:54, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support This looks like it has met the FL criteria to be promoted.BLUE _DOG^TN 17:06, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support Everything looks great! WereWolf (talk) 16:25, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Didn't have any issues with the lead last time, and a quick check revealed no new causes for concern. I did inquire about the one source, but since that's gone it's no longer an issue. Nice work. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 00:13, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support Looks pretty good. Adabow (talk) 11:46, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.