Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/The Bellflower Bunnies (season 1)/archive1
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was not promoted by User:Scorpion0422 20:53, 22 November 2008 [1].
The main list received no consensus recently, so we're trying this one to see what happens now. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 16:14, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
"Restart" at 16:19, 4 November 2008, nothing negative, but not enough to reach consensus |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)
Comments
|
Comments - sources look okay, links checked out with the link checker tool. Note I did not evaluate the non-English sources. Ealdgyth - Talk 18:00, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Slgrandson responds:
- I think I can rewrite the plot descriptions, since I have the R1 DVDs. (Actually, this may as well affect any chance for the next two seasons to have a go at FLC any time soon, because I haven't seen every one yet!)
- The R1 discs for season 1 are in English only, and I don't seem to have found anything online concerning this season's French cast. (This calls for an R2 import, but it'll have to wait how many days or weeks...)
- DVD tables may be a problem because, unlike those of major U.S./British shows, the packaging and content(s) of Bellflower's first two seasons vary across different countries.
- I've already revamped the episode tables with {{Episode list}}, and made other tweaks per comments.
So, what else is there after this? --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 05:33, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support All my issues are resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 18:29, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments by SatyrTN
- The cleanup banners means the list doesn't meet WP:WIAFL #3 and/or #7. I recognize that the nominator added those after nomination, but the fact that they are there makes it hard to recommend promoting the list.
- There's a *lot* of lede text for four episodes. I'm worried that a single-season list may be too short - but I haven't read the previous discussion, so I may be off base.
- Two of the summaries are a bit long, and two of them are a bit short.
- Are the trailers public-domain? If not (and I suspect not), then the "External link" to the YouTube trailers is inappropriate.
- Ditto with the two minute clip at KI.KA
- I could be wrong, but I don't think the "External links" to distributors is appropriate either.
- For now I'm going to
Oppose this FL candidate. If the cleanup banner and summary issues are addressed, I may change my !vote. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 23:18, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Imo, this is inherently too short a list to need to be a list article. It should go to GAN. Only 4 episodes does not need a list, and breaking up the table with prose means there is absolutely no benefit from using the table. that, along with the unbalanced plot recapsfor the episodes = oppose. Recomend this for GAN, and only the combined list for FLC, although i wonder why seperate series articles are even needed - none are so long that they would look better merged. Yobmod (talk) 20:36, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.