Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Timeline of strategic nuclear weapon systems of the United Kingdom/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was withdrawn by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 19 September 2022 (UTC) [1].[reply]
Timeline of strategic nuclear weapon systems of the United Kingdom[edit]
Timeline of strategic nuclear weapon systems of the United Kingdom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Featured list candidates/Timeline of strategic nuclear weapon systems of the United Kingdom/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
A simple timeline. I created it for my own use while developing a series of articles on British nuclear weapons. Title comes from the infobox. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:56, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Opposein present form. There is literally no lead at all -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 06:52, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Procedural note
The nominator of this list, User:Hawkeye7, has another nomination, Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of United States Military Academy First Captains/archive1, not yet archived. The FLC instructions state: "Nominators should not add a second featured list nomination until the first has gained substantial support and reviewers' concerns have been substantially addressed". The first nomination does not has is considered as 'substantial support'. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 12:17, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Dank[edit]
Drive-by comment: in addition to Kavyansh's point, there's another potential problem. One of the things that sometimes takes nominators by surprise at FLC (it sure as hell surprised me!) is how rigorous reviewers can be about the method used to include or exclude things from your list. If you can select one or more of your highest-quality sources, and then make the case that the only events that made it into this list were the ones that were singled out in some way by that set of sources, then you should be fine (not guaranteed, but probably). Otherwise, not so much. - Dank (push to talk) 22:48, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- At FAC you are allowed to have a second nomination in collaboration with another editor. I did not realise that was not the case here. @WP:FLC director and delegates: Plase withdraw the nomination. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 23:25, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been withdrawn, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:18, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.