Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of Canadian provincial and territorial orders/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
List of Canadian provincial and territorial orders[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page. The closing editor's comments were: While there was no consensus regarding the lead section, the lack of citations for two orders, as well as the fact that this has not been updated since 2006, indicate that other objections/problems have not been addressed. These make this no longer a featured list. Miss Madeline
I am nominating this page because it was promoted over two years ago and I feel that it no longer meets the FL criteria. The page has a very small lead (criteria 2a), doesn't have proper sections (criteria 2b) and should give more info about the awards. Not every order has a citation (in fact, there are no references at all for two of them) so it doesn't meet 2c. Also, due to the lack of content on the page, I feel that it no longer meets 1b. -- Scorpion0422 19:58, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Fine lead and no need for sections in this table. Rmhermen (talk) 04:51, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- How is the lead fine? It is not "a concise lead section that summarizes the scope of the list and prepares the reader for the higher level of detail in sections subsequent to the lead" -- Scorpion0422 16:24, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I think that it does precisely that. Rmhermen (talk) 17:54, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I disagree. The list should be lengthened and there should be more info on the page. With a list that small, it should at least have a good portion of text so that it justifies its status as "wikipedia's best work". As well, one vital thing missing from the table is the date/year that order was first given, and it wouldn't hurt to list the criteria for some of these awards on the page somwhere. I also just noticed that there are no sources whatsoever for the Order of Ontario and Order of Prince Edward Island. -- Scorpion0422 15:28, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I think that it does precisely that. Rmhermen (talk) 17:54, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- How is the lead fine? It is not "a concise lead section that summarizes the scope of the list and prepares the reader for the higher level of detail in sections subsequent to the lead" -- Scorpion0422 16:24, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]