Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/90Milebeach

Pages viewed on:

Nominate and support- This picture is truly eye-catching. Wikipedian27 22:59, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Somehow, this nom never made it to the FPC main page. Listing it now. Note: this was previously nominated at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/90 mile beach. MER-C 12:49, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose lovely compostion and it is eye catching but i cant help but feel more of the beach could be shown --Childzy ¤ Talk 20:10, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Low encyclopedic value. Pictures of pretty beaches are a dime a dozen. Cacophony 08:04, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
weak support very high quality picture but the concern about only a little bit of the beach being shown is valid. --St.daniel ^Talk 13:36, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Correct composition and good technical quality. But that is not enough for FP. Lacks enc relevancy and the horizon is tilted ccw. Alvesgaspar 19:57, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cacophony. Unschool 07:31, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 09:25, 22 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]