Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Ardea alba1

Nominate and support. - Raul654 21:23, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Background is too messy and distracting for me. Played around with the DOF a bit but still didn't look good. - JPM | 21:45, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with JPM, the background is too chaotic - Adrian Pingstone 21:50, 27 January 2006 (UTC)d[reply]
Oppose not striking, I also agree about the DOF, should have used a smaller aperture to isolate the subject. PPGMD 21:51, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Agree with above. Alr 00:13, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Just not striking.--Ali K 05:06, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Background is distracting... can some blurring be done to "fix" this? --Dante Alighieri | Talk 09:33, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Good, but nothing to push it beyond good to special. enochlau (talk) 14:13, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, nothing wrong with trees in the background, or with the subject, but even at high-resolution the image is too blurry. = Mgm|^(talk) 10:24, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Calderwood 10:27, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted Raven4x4x 04:50, 10 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]