Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Cleaner fish and White-spotted puffer

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Sep 2010 at 06:44:50 (UTC)

Reason: Great quality action photo taken in a wild. Very good EV, details are seen in both fishes. Already Featured on Commons.
Articles in which this image appears: Cleaner fish
FP category for this image
Creator: Mbz1

Support as nominator --George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:44, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Way too much chromatic aberration makes it hard to make out any details whatever -- Yannis A 12:43, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
- Is it possible they're bioluminescent? --I'ḏ ♥One 13:24, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support It is a natural color of the fish. Great image as usual. Broccoli (talk) 14:18, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. This is hardly a perfect illustration for the article. The lead image seems stronger, EV-wise. J Milburn (talk) 17:31, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Are you kidding me? The current lead is blue with a URL on it. --I'ḏ♥One 22:41, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - I agree- it's a poor picture compared to this one for FPC consideration, but it does illustrate the subject better. That's all I was saying. The best picture isn't necessarily the most illustrative or valuable. J Milburn (talk) 22:45, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support More or less per the nom. I'd prefer it if this were in the puffer article, too. I think it would have much greater EV (and my full support) if it talked about its camouflage and the symbiotic relationship there. 23:47, 23 August 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cowtowner (talk • contribs)
Oppose per Yannis and Milburn. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 17:36, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 04:44, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]