Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Diagram of Jupiter

Diagram of Jupiter[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2014 at 04:35:52 (UTC)

Reason: Very informative and encyclopedic diagram in svg format. I replaced a simpler diagram in the article with this one. I think the quality improvement is so significant that there is no need to wait seven days.
Articles in which this image appears: Jupiter
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Space/Understanding
Creator: Kelvinsong

Support as nominator --Pine^✉ 04:35, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Also upvoting on the commons FP. This is an outstanding SVG diagram Seppi333 (Insert 2¢ | Maintained) 09:50, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Wouldn't have thought this was an SVG before clicking it, a valuable diagram of outstanding quality. Lewis Hulbert (talk) 09:58, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Brandmeister^talk 17:36, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pink for the win! Saffron Blaze (talk) 01:37, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear I've turned you all into common white girlss... 😂😂—Love, Kelvinsong talk 14:06, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Kelvinsong: Can I have your autograph? Seppi333 (Insert 2¢ | Maintained) 23:03, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

here : ~~~~ 💁—Love, Kelvinsong talk 01:27, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

question What are the two faint circles just to the right of the "far south temperate zone" text?

Bokeh from the starry background—Love, Kelvinsong talk 03:09, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely. Given that all the moons appear to be in focus the image must be at the hyperfocal distance.©Geni (talk) 15:43, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Look closely the moons are bokeh circles too—Love, Kelvinsong talk 00:40, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support this is a high quality, high EV picture, and on top of it it's an SVG. A very well made diagram. --CyberXRef^☎ 23:40, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Couple questions: first, according to Metallic hydrogen that state of the element is thought to be common in Jupiter, but not confirmed; why is the conjectural nature of this diagram not explicit? Second, why do you need 5000 px width when this is legible at half that size? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:55, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Idk, every source I looked at had metallic hydrogen labeled. && I try to avoid too many asterixes on my pictures—Love, Kelvinsong talk 22:17, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Half that size would not fit my monitor, where this has resided as the background for the last week. Saffron Blaze (talk) 21:19, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an SVG, it could be rendered (and thus downloaded) at any size. Kevin, I'm not saying this needs to be in the image itself, but at least on the information page. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:22, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's 5000 px bc that's the size I drew it & I don't resize it bc I don't trust Inkscape not to make rounding errors on the coordinates so I avoid certain transformations like rotation & dialation as much as possible—Love, Kelvinsong talk 23:26, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. So just a note on the information page and then... — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:51, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done—Love, Kelvinsong talk 00:47, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Well done diagram. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:58, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose diagram not supportd by article text.--(AfadsBad (talk) 05:03, 31 March 2014 (UTC))[reply]

Promoted File:Jupiter diagram.svg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:03, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]