Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Downtown Los Angeles, CA at night

Original - Downtown Los Angeles, CA at night

Reason: There simply isn't a better picture of Los Angeles, California. This image provides a view of Downtown at night. I took this photo last night and I think it’s a Featured picture.
Articles this image appears in: Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, California, Greater Los Angeles Area,

Support as nominator --Zink Dawg -- 17:18, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Sorry Zink Dawg. It isn't anything like a FP. It's less than 1000px wide/high, it's noisy, it's blurry and the white balance is probably quite off (too warm). You might want to look at Wikipedia:Featured picture criteria. Diliff | (Talk) (Contribs) 17:54, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy close per Diliff --Muhammad(talk) 23:57, 26 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Snowball close Does not meet criteria. — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 16:06, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Likewise, this image is just WAY to similar to this image.... — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 16:14, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - CommentWow, that's actually the same image, but in infinitely worse quality. -- mcshadypl ^T ^C 17:44, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Nice spot, it isn't even just similar, as per above it's the same image. Given that the nominator/uploader claims it was taken last night, I think we'd beg to differ... At best misleading, but more likely not their image at all... 19:34, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
  - Almost every image this user has uploaded is obvious copyright violations hes claiming is his. I've nominated all most all for deletion. Whats funny is theres obviously fake metadata in these images to make it look like less obviously ripped off image. — raeky ^{(talk | edits)} 21:23, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 01:16, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]