Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/European Garden Spider

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

European Garden Spider[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2010 at 16:36:45 (UTC)

Original - European Garden Spider (Araneus diadematus) waiting for prey. Notice the characteristic croce-like pattern on the abdomen and the signal thread connecting one of the legs to the web.
Reason
A detailed and good quality depiction of the species in its natural environment, adding to the article
Articles in which this image appears
European Garden Spider
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Arachnids
Creator
Alvesgaspar (talk)
I noticed that too but, though it doesn't mention it explicitly in the article, this seems to be a nocturnal beast so you'd pretty much have to use a flash to get the picture.--RDBury (talk) 08:41, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not so, the picture was taken by day (check EXIF info) -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:49, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - Maybe it is a very accurate picture, but I couldn't tell what it was until I read it was a spider. The article has other pictures which I think show it more clearly. Anoldtreeok (talk) 23:59, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • comment Actually, I can see it now having found out what it is, and looking at it at full res it's quite clear. I think this may be just a case of something not looking right when made smaller. So, I'll undo my previous vote for now, but won't support just yet. Anoldtreeok (talk) 00:03, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - It looks as though a flash was used and it portrayed a harsh shadow behind the subject. AmericanXplorer13 (talk) 23:22, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm not so worried about the flash, but I think this image is much clearer and more interesting. Thoughts? Aaadddaaammm (talk) 18:44, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think that image is better, but don't think looking at the bottom of the spider is the best view. Anoldtreeok (talk) 05:17, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Jujutacular talk 22:32, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]