Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Hibiscus Closeup

Close up of the hibiscus, i think this can be a good example for macro photography. please provide your feedback.

Self Nominate and support. - vineeth 08:45, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, very good. Support. - Samsara _contrib ^talk 11:57, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. I think we already have plenty of better Featured pictures for macrophotography, and this doesn't depict the Hibiscus very well. — ₀₉₁₈^BRIAN • 2006-02-15 13:15
- There are exactly two in the article, neither of which is a nature photograph. - Samsara _contrib ^talk 15:12, 15 February 2006 (UTC)*[reply]
  - Macro photography isn't the only place to find macro photographs that are Featured and are of nature. But, as you said, there are already 2 Featured Pictures in that article alone. — ₀₉₁₈^BRIAN • 2006-02-16 00:02
Oppose This could be almost any flower so doesn't add anything to the article. As a picture I like it a lot, I just don't see it as a Featured Pic - Adrian Pingstone 15:34, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. It is a nice picture. However, it is not a good illustration for an encyclopedia. Mikeo 18:38, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Agree with Adrian and Mikeo. And I prefer the other nature pic in the macro photography article ;-P --Dschwen 07:30, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ACK Mikeo Calderwood 07:46, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above. Good pic, but not FA quality. Thanks! Flcelloguy (A note?) 21:17, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted Pegasus1138^{Talk | Contribs | Email} ---- 02:28, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]