Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/High dynamic range imaging

Central_Park_Reservoir.jpg

An example of a rendering of an HDRI image into an 8 bit jpg. Of the Central Park Reservoir in NYC.

Image taken by Darien S. Acosta 04:03, 28 September 2006 (UTC) from the south side of the Central Park Reservoir in New York City.

Nominate and support. - Epiphanyp7a 04:54, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose VERY VERY VERY visible artifect in the clouds. Most of the image is absolutely dark and I think a single RAW shot of a decent DSLR can cover the same dynamic range, and thus is not a very good example for HDRI. Also it does not add to any article which is a requirement for FP. --antilived ^{T | C | G} 05:27, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Visible misalignments in the leaves of the plant (lower RHS) --Fir0002 05:45, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, stitching errors, severe in clouds and leaves (a re-stitch might fix this), also it appears not to be in any article. This would be a nice desktop picture, but it is not very "enc". --Janke | Talk 06:23, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose blurring in the buildings to the right, either focus or motion problems, in addition to all issues mentioned above. Nifty picture though. --Bridgecross 14:57, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above. Misaligned images. All the source images used in HDR need to be exactly the same size/frame or else this occurs (the next best thing is to very carefully hand align the images by resizing, or get the software to do it, though I don't know how accurate of results that gets).--Andrew c 15:28, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The image is blurry, and has various misalignment problems. Hello32020 20:58, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Ahem, can I just point out the obvious: this picture is gorgeous. Really nicely done. Yes, it has some stitching problems that probably can't be fixed (looks like the clouds moved), but, well, good job anyway :) Stevage 01:36, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sorry to disagree with everyone (above), but I think this actually meets the criteria, although the quality isn't the best of FP. --James 00:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted Raven4x4x 06:44, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]