Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Human Male penis

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Human male penis[edit]

Note: The image needs to be clicked on to be seen, for some obscure reason. I followed all nomination procedures, so i've no idea what it is

Reason
Although an unconventional nomination, we have to remember when voting, that wikipedia is not censored. I find this image to be well composed, clear, high resolution and rather sharp. It also demonstrates the subject well.
Articles this image appears in
Penis
Creator
David Shankbone
  • Support as nominator — Hadseys 21:17, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose image is off center, the background is too dark, the guys head is cut off (which I find distracting), and any photograph of the male penis should cover both sides of the subject. TomStar81 (Talk) 23:05, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Its a photograph of his penis not his head; either way it still shows the subject well.
  • Note: This page added as an exception on the bad image list for this image. Should appear normally now. - BanyanTree 23:33, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per criteria 2: not large enough. Ƙɽɨɱρᶓȶ 00:25, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment at 1633 × 1735 pixels this is technically large enough for a shot through FPC. TomStar81 (Talk) 01:13, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • speedy close this troll nom - but in case you need a real reason: harsh lighting, poor composition, erect state is atypical of penes, obvious jpeg artifacts and given prevalence of subject an aesthetically appealing image should be procurable. Debivort 02:47, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes indeed, a quick look at the nominator's contributions shows virtually nothing outside of FPC. Not promoted . MER-C 03:18, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I only just created an account! And it is an encyclopedic image so dont have a go at me
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/Human_Male_penis&oldid=1062601727"