Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Jama Masjid

Jama Majid[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Aug 2013 at 02:18:12 (UTC)

Reason: This image struck me as particularly alluring
Articles in which this image appears: Mosque, Jama Masjid, Delhi, Gyula Germanus
FP category for this image: Places
Creator: Ashcouunter

Support as nominator --QatarStarsLeague (talk) 02:18, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - primary issues are 1) the angle and perspective are odd and 2) the sky around the sun is so blown that it is solid white with strange artifacting and it leaves the rest of the scene dark. Chris857 (talk) 02:29, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't feel the perspective and angle utilized has a depreciative effect on the image. What exactly do you mean by "blown". Blurry? Additionally, the darkened hue effect is the phenotype of this picture, and the reason I feel it could make a featured picture. Anyway, thank you for your constructive response. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 02:57, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - low EV as there is no light on the subject. Sanyambahga (talk) 07:09, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I agree with Chris857, moreover hue has nothing to do with an article related to Mosque. Godhulii 1985 (talk) 11:16, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your correct, it doesn't. It just makes for a captivating image. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 14:43, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose HDR makes the picture look too artificial and gives moving objects a very obvious blur behind them. This perspective also isn't ideal. -- mcshadypl ^T ^C 21:53, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Lighting is very dark, hard to clearly see mosque. Also obstructed by birds. Mattximus (talk) 14:34, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose, backlighting and gigantic blown highlight (i.e., the sun) completely ruin this. Daniel Case (talk) 15:18, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 02:18, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]