Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/MV Seabourn Quest

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

MV Seabourn Quest[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Oct 2013 at 15:06:28 (UTC)

OriginalMV Seabourn Quest docked in Sète, France.
Reason
High resolution and quality, pretty good view at the bow of the ship, size is striking
Articles in which this image appears
MV Seabourn Quest
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Vehicles/Water
Creator
Christian Ferrer
  • Support as nominator -- — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:06, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support THIS is the detail work that I personally find to be the most important characteristic of a featured picture. I can read the numbers on the hull marking the depth of water. Great job. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 15:12, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment There's a lot of empty foreground and the tower part of the building is hiding part of some kind of antenna-looking object on the tip of the bow. – Kerαunoςcopiagalaxies 05:51, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Um, how can the building be "hiding" something that is wholly in front of it? 86.160.218.148 (talk) 22:54, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Really good camouflage. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 00:58, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Tomer T (talk) 10:53, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support although I understand the second concern raised by Keraunoscopia. JKadavoor Jee 12:27, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose The composition is a bit cluttered, and that's not a great angle for understanding what the ship looks like - something like this angle is superior (though the lighting and technical standards of this photo are superior). Nick-D (talk) 01:47, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose -- Per Nick-D -- Dougie WII (talk) 04:29, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose: Per oppose votes above. Would loved it if it were a closer shot. Proudbolsahye (talk) 04:12, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 15:08, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]