Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Mabel Vernon

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2019 at 20:28:03 (UTC)

Reason: This is one of the requests I got. Not particularly hard, but I think the results are worth it. Typical 1910s-1920s fadeout at the bottom, which I think is fine; nothing too awful to fix. I did spend some extra time on the face, as that always seems to pay dividends. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.1% of all FPs} 23:57, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Articles in which this image appears: Mabel Vernon, National Woman's Party, Hall of Fame of Delaware Women
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political
Creator: Edmonston, Washington, D.C.; restored by Adam Cuerden

Support as nominator – Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.1% of all FPs} 20:28, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:47, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Geoffroi 05:46, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 19:15, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support – For historical EV only. Detail isn't up to others from this era that Adam has restored. – Sca (talk) 12:28, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @Sca: Insofar as it helps, this is kind of an era where soft focus was considered artistic. I believe it's the best image we're likely to get of her, but I do see your point. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.1% of all FPs} 09:24, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

10-4. I've seen that in some old family photos. Sca (talk) 13:41, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It may have been shot with a Petzval "portrait" lens, but in addition to the soft focus, it looks like there's a bit of motion blur, too. --Janke | Talk 09:48, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Mabel Vernon, c. 1917, by Edmonston, Washington, D.C..jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 21:28, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]