Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Male common tiger

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 18 Mar 2019 at 17:17:04 (UTC)

Support as nominator – Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:17, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Charlesjsharp Common tiger is a disambiguation page. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:01, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The image is used in Danaus genutia, the species article. MER-C 18:59, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support. MER-C 18:59, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:37, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support One can see the individual scales. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 6.4% of all FPs} 22:18, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Charles, I ran this through a gentle unsharp mask as I find it a little soft at full size - personally I think it improved it considerably for those zooming in. Would you be able to put up an alt version? Otherwise a very good capture. Closer, please take this as a Support if it needs a fifth before the time runs out. --jjron (talk) 07:11, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see your alt version unfortunately, jjron. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:24, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, I haven't uploaded it. Just ran it through a filter when I was looking in Photoshop and thought it came up better. I thought you'd rather do it yourself if it was to be done though. Nothing severe. I can try uploading one if you want, but not sure when I'll get around to it, and it's been so long since I uploaded any images I can't even remember how to do it! --jjron (talk) 07:37, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not to worry. From comments ovedr the years, we all see sharpening a little differently. At a 'normal' viewing size, sharpening improves the look of a picture, but the same image will be rejected at Commons FP for sharpening artefacts visible in close-up. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:07, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Common tiger (Danaus genutia genutia) male underside.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 20:16, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]