Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Opposition

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Opposition[edit]

Original - No, no, no.
Reason
One of the most useful images in Wikipedia. Scalable svg format. Also available in economy sizes. Seen here in its native habitat (except for the image frame).
Articles in which this image appears
Elections, Addition, Talk:Wikipedia biography controversy, Talk:New Jersey Turnpike
Creator
Zscout370
  • Oppose as nominator --Spikebrennan (talk) 16:31, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose, not really all that useful. Tom(2¢) 16:38, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Used much too rarely, especially on WP:FPC. --Dschwen 16:51, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Dschwen.--Mbz1 (talk) 17:02, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Clearly tilted to the left. Ever heard of a tripod?! Jujutacular T · C 18:45, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose No one ever uses it. Reach Out to the Truth 20:00, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think there's potential for the "oppose paradox", in much the same way as we have the liar paradox. If we oppose, we prove how useful it is... J Milburn (talk) 21:33, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    • "Pragmatic self-refutation". There's a term you don't hear every day. Opposing (with the oppose symbol) becsause it is not used is an example of pragmatic self-refutation. J Milburn (talk) 21:40, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per nom. Fletcher (talk) 22:20, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support --Muhammad(talk) 00:01, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 00:15, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]