Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Petronas Towers

Petronas Towers

An impressively lit night-time shot of the Petronas Towers by Commons user Angel Riesgo.

Nominate and support - Solipsist 21:09, 14 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, that's nice. It's really hard to take a picture of a skyscraper and get a proper idea of its sheer bulk, and this really achieves that. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 21:22, July 14, 2005 (UTC)
- Support either version (although the edited version loses the highlighting around the top edge, which I liked). -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 15:44, July 17, 2005 (UTC)
To become one of the best pictures on Wikipedia. Phoenix2 22:39, July 14, 2005 (UTC)
- Support, grainy issue was cleared up in the edited version. -- Phoenix 00:08, 18 July 2005
Looks like it's taken straight out of a sci-fi movie... unreal. Enochlau 05:18, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The hi-res picture is very grainy. Phils 10:12, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- That is indeed true. Perhaps run it over with a blur. Enochlau 11:00, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - Done, hope you like it --Fir0002 08:50, July 16, 2005 (UTC)
    - Support edited version. Enochlau 11:05, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support edited version --Fir0002 08:50, July 16, 2005 (UTC)
Wow, this one caught my eye as I was scrolling down. Very nice. --coblin 10:56, July 16, 2005 (UTC)
- Support either version --coblin 05:20, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
Support -- great image. - Longhair | Talk 03:56, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support edited version. The sheer size and bulk of the building is amazing... TomStar81
Support --ZeWrestler 15:30, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support edited version. James F. (talk) 23:16, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Very nice. Sango 123 18:14, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
Question - What are the American laws on pictures of buildings? In Icelandic law, which is all I know, a picture which has a building (or a sculpture) as its main content can be hampered by the architect's copyright. Is there something similar over there? In any case the picture is amazing. - Haukurth 01:36, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This came up at a conference I was at, and I believe it can be an issue, but only if money is made off of it. This would be a strong candidate for 'fair use', in my non-professional opinion. --DNicholls 02:30, 24 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Either version. Stunning Ferg2k 05:13, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support either version. This will end up in the front page sooner or later. -- Titoxd 03:29, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support Malaysia Boleh!!!
Strong support, dazzling and one of the best images I've ever seen here. — Stevey7788 (talk) 20:57, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Great photo! --Andylkl ^(talk) 17:13, July 22, 2005 (UTC)
Support, the nicest photo of a skyscraper I've seen in a while. Ben Lunsford 18:33, July 22, 2005 (UTC)
Support. Edited version. Very striking. Balster neb 17:30, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Looks like one of those 'artist's conceptions'. Striking edges. Jogloran 09:00, July 24, 2005 (UTC)
Strongly Support --ScottyBoy900Q∞ 20:47, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted Image:Torres Petronas Mayo 2004.jpg +20 / -0 preference for the edited version, but I have now overloaded that on the Commons original since they are otherwise similar -- Solipsist 20:42, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]