Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Prosobranchia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Prosobranchia [edit]

"Prosobranchia" lithograph from Ernst Haeckel's Kunstformen der Natur (1904)

A striking antique (1904) lithograph, illustrating a variety of prosobranch gastropods. I scanned and uploaded this image.--ragesoss 09:26, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Nominate and support. - ragesoss 09:26, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. High in detail, and nice contrast. — 0918BRIAN • 2006-03-12 09:46
  • Support nice picture --vineeth 10:09, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Nice image and really adds to the article. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 11:15, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support for a very cool collage. Staxringold 15:12, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Oh go on then ;-) ~ VeledanTalk 17:46, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Much of the value of Haeckel's work comes from after you're done looking at the lithograph, you can then learn more about each or any organism presented. I'd like to see species names on the talk page please (I've already added another ugly number key, so you can fill in the blanks) :) —Pengo 16:30, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'll fill those in next week, when I get home and have the book again. Thanks again, Pengo!--ragesoss 16:33, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nevermind. Already done now. Sadly none of the species illustrated have their own articles (at least not under Haeckel's often outdated binomials) —Pengo 08:59, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per my support of all the previous lithos. –Joke 23:52, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Yes, yes, yes! - Samsara (talkcontribs) 11:23, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Great picture, good quality scan, clear, important.
  • Support A great, clear picture! Canuck89 21:43, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong support IMO this could qualify as a model photo to demonstrate what FPs is all about. --Philopedia 22:29, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted Haeckel Prosobranchia.jpg --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 08:51, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]