Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Purple Swamphen

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 May 2013 at 10:11:06 (UTC)

Reason: I think it stacks up against all the quality criteria. This is the Australasian subspecies. It was put into the species article as a replacement for an existing FP, so I'm also suggesting delisting for that one. The second existing FP (in the taxobox) is of a different subspecies, and has a very different appearance.
Articles in which this image appears: Purple Swamphen Wollongong Botanic Gardens
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Creator: 99of9

Support as nominator --99of9 (talk) 10:11, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support although the delist nom should be handled separately. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:36, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I understand it is hard to shoot animals when they are moving, but the head seems blur enough. Arctic Kangaroo (✉ • ✎) 13:34, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support as one who inserted this picture, replacing that existing FP. I think I did enough homework before that. J Kadavoor J e e 14:23, 19 May 2013 (UTC)...and Delist the other mentioned above per Chick Bowen. J Kadavoor J e e 06:16, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Wingtipvorte^X PTT ∅ 22:23, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace. That is, I support this, and I'd ask someone to add my vote, with a link back here, to a delist nom when one is opened (which it should be). Chick Bowen 00:06, 24 May 2013 (UTC) (Or alternately we could just consider this a delist and replace nomination per the Obama one above. Chick Bowen 01:19, 24 May 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Promoted File:Purple Swamp Hen Wollongong.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 10:15, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]