Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Rome subway graffiti

Rome subway graffiti

Reason: Shameless self-nomination
Caption: What sets the Roman metro apart from that of many other European cities is that graffiti on its trains is near ubiquitous. This is a photograph of a one of the stations in central Rome, and the state of this particular train is pretty similar to the state of many other trains in the city.
Articles this image appears in: Rome metro
Creator: Levan
Nominator: Levan

Support — Levan 21:28, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment You'll definitely need a caption (just what station that is, something about the graffiti in the Roman metro and so on; it doesn't need to be an essay).
Support AHH!!! Vandalsim! Just kidding, seriously it looks pretty nice and illustrates the article well. ~ Arjun 21:46, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support- matbe this should also go in Graffiti? Jorcoga ^(Hi!/Review)00:11, Saturday, 3 February '07
Oppose Nothing dramaticly great about it - nice picture, but nothing that really "stands out" above other pictures. ≈ The Haunted Angel ^{(The Forest Whispers My Name)} 01:15, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Wrong angle, muddy colors, everyday topic. ~ trialsanderrors 01:30, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I fail to see how this is a FP! As pointed out in the nom. it is not unique, yet nor is it a particularly attractive photo or particularly good spray-art. Also, this doesn't repreesnt the Roman subway any more than any other ill-maintained metro system. Witty lama 01:58, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Right side unfocused, too dark/muddy, unspectacular. --TotoBaggins 02:40, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It is decent but when it comes down to it I must agree with trialsanderrors on this one.--γιατί ^{Sign Here | ESP.} 03:16, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose — To me, graffiti is not FPC material. Too dark and stuff like that. ♥Tohru Honda13♥ 04:18, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I disagree; we should have an FP of graffiti but this just isn't a very good shot --⁪froth^T 19:50, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 07:15, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]