Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/SR-71

SR-71

Great shot of the plane, great background, very high res, best pic in article, also fits in the backgrounds category.

Nominate and support. - Ravedave 03:52, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support looks excellent, can't really see any way to fault it. chowells 13:28, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Had to look close to see that the wing tip wasn't cut off... ;-) --Janke | Talk 14:13, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Majestic picture. --Thermos 16:55, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. The classic SR-71 photo. — ₀₉₁₈^BRIAN • 2006-03-23 17:43
Support Looks good. It would perhaps be wise not to rely too heavily on pictures provided by the American military (or NASA) when building a portfolio of featured images. It is another kind of systemic bias encountered in Wikipedia. –Joke 17:56, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Until you can come up with a source that rivals the US govt for good pictures I think its bound to happen. -Ravedave 18:52, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree. But it is best to be aware of it. –Joke 21:05, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Excellent detail and background. --Aude (talk | contribs) 22:10, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support - wonderful image, informative, striking, excellent detail - Johntex\^talk 01:30, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support, I really like the colours and the background. --Ter e nc e Ong 14:59, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support, nice one! - Mailer Diablo 00:18, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support incredibly nice image of a very famous plane. Staxringold 07:34, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support - striking photo JanSuchy 09:01, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Great image, wonderful background --Scot ^t 11:26, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Striking. -- Mac Davis] ⌇☢ ญƛ. 12:36, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent background, highly detailed, nice shadowing Search 4 Lancer 02:58, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great action, colors, background.--Mr. RX99 20:01, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support How could I oppose? Great picture. --Lewk_of_Serthic _contrib ^talk 23:58, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support, and there ain’t no more to say. TomStar81 08:04, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's all been said --Fir0002 www 10:31, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent photo, great quality showing the influential aircraft in the sky.--Andeee 22:43, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great image, I currently use it as my desktop background! -- Snailwalker | talk 13:01, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great picture. L e idi ot 03:21, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent composition. Covington 08:57, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Bandwagon. Another one of my long-time favorites. --Golbez 07:04, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted Image:Lockheed SR-71.jpg --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 03:54, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to move the featured picture tag to Image:Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird.jpg, which is the same image, except it's 2.8 times larger, and it's on the Commons. How is it that no one who voted noticed that the picture that was nominated was only a thumbnail? Anyway, I'm then going to update links to the thumbnail and nominate it for deletion. User:dbenbenn 19:45, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]