Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Sandboarding

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sandboarding[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2012 at 11:17:56 (UTC)

OriginalSandboarding in Jebel Ali, Dubai
Reason
High EV and quality, good dynamics and good illustration of sandboarding
Articles in which this image appears
Sandboarding
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Culture, entertainment, and lifestyle/Sport
Creator
Steven J. Weber
  • Support as nominator --Tomer T (talk) 11:17, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - A sport that has always interested me, a good picture too. Oakley77 (talk) 22:54, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support OK, why not? Aaadddaaammm (talk) 11:09, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Snapshot of an obscure pursuit, claims of quality not sustained on closer examination. Good for the college magazine but it isn't pro-sports photography level nor is it FP-worthy. I shall resist the temptation to insert A vowel back there despite my conclusions as it its popularity already. Plutonium27 (talk) 21:26, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support we feature photos of obscure birds, so it seems fair to feature photos of obscure sports. If they're notable enough for an article then they're notable enough for FP. This photo seems like a reasonable illustration of the sport. Pine 05:36, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support meets the criteria.--GoPTCN 10:27, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Per plutonium. Its soft. Dusty777 18:45, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral "Obscure pursuit" would normally help it, because the photograph would have a strong EV. However, there are other illustrations to much the same effect in the article so what would otherwise be a very strong EV – and one which for me would outweight its not massive technical faults – but with them, it is one of many. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 21:04, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Sandboarding in Dubai.jpg --Jujutacular (talk) 22:04, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]