Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Snowy owl
Appearance
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2015 at 16:22:56 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e3/Bubo_scandiacus_%28Linnaeus%2C_1758%29_Male.jpg/260px-Bubo_scandiacus_%28Linnaeus%2C_1758%29_Male.jpg)
- Reason
- Sharp, lead image, interesting species.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Snowy owl, List of birds of Newfoundland and Labrador
- FP category for this image
- Birds
- Creator
- Michael Gäbler
- Support as nominator – Brandmeistertalk 16:22, 20 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support – Interesting. Sca (talk) 01:11, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support – DreamSparrow talk 12:09, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose Although this is a very good shot of most of a snowy owl, I'd like to see the tail in a featured pic.(not just the tail; that would definitely be an oppose) Belle (talk) 00:23, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
- Comment There is some grain that I thought it was noise at first, but at an ISO of 200 it doesn't seem likely. Maybe it has been over-sharpened a bit? --Ebertakis (talk) 20:34, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support – Interesting. Hafspajen (talk) 13:17, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
- Comment – I don't think we need to see the tail to appreciate the finely detailed pristine plummage shown in this shot. There is a pic of one with tail at Snowy owl. (And DYK they even have them in Sweden?) Sca (talk) 13:32, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
- Comment seems to be a very badly overblown highlight. Somewhat towards the right bottom of the owl, a bit up and in, on the wing? Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:35, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
- Support -Jobas (talk) 01:33, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
- Oppose - Multiple instances of badly blown highlights. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:25, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Promoted File:Bubo scandiacus (Linnaeus, 1758) Male.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 18:00, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
- There is a 71,4% support for promotion. Armbrust The Homunculus 18:00, 30 June 2015 (UTC)