Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Space Needle and Skyline

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Space Needle and Skyline[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 Jan 2013 at 03:02:14 (UTC)

Original – A view of the Seattle skyline, including the Space Needle, presumably during the evening
Reason
A quality shot of the Seattle skyline, with the famous Space Needle somewhat in the foreground.
Articles in which this image appears
Seattle, List of metropolitan areas in the Americas
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Panorama
Creator
Rattlhed
  • Support as nominator --AutomaticStrikeout (TC) 03:02, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Although the image size is low, I enjoy looking at it. It has a well-balanced composition (the trees may look burned, but they aren't by a bit), the skyline is positioned in one of the thirds of the shot, which increases its visual appeal. The degrading colour of the sky is shocking. The only fault I could find is the fact that the buildings behind the skyline are a bit shaded in grey; I would have preffered to see them with pure colours, but I guess this was not intentional. Another minor detail is the trees placed at each one of the low corners of the image. — ΛΧΣ21 03:45, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. Nice photo, but well below current size size requirements, especially given its scenic scope. If you can replace it with a bigger version I'll reconsider. --jjron (talk) 11:51, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Too small for my liking - it may be within criteria but I would want to be able to zoom in further for a shot of this style. But my main objection is the lighting. I don't know if any special effects have been used, but the needle looks fake and superimposed onto the picture. Just to clarify I know it isn't! Just saying it looks it from the weird looking lighting. gazhiley 11:54, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • You beat me to this jjron! If it is below size requirements then that validates my first concern. gazhiley 11:55, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose WAY to small. — raekyt 02:12, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Fails size requirements. Dusty777 03:17, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 03:46, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]