Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Swami Vivekananda in London December 1896

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Swami Vivekananda in London in December 1896[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 19 Sep 2013 at 06:00:03 (UTC)

Original – Swami Vivekananda in London in December 1896
Reason
Vivekananda went to U.S. in 1893 and then moved to England in 1895. Though many photos of Vivekananda were taken at this time, only few photos were printed in color (mostly for promoting and using in posters, billboards), such as File:Swami Vivekananda 1893 Scanned Image.jpg. The image nominated here was taken in 1896
Articles in which this image appears
Josephine MacLeod, J. J. Goodwin
FP category for this image
People
Creator
Unknown
  • Support as nominator --TitoDutta 06:00, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - What EV does this have outside Vivekanada's article? Also, looks like the exposure is too high (lots of really bright whites) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:08, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Encyclopedic value" - how much the image contributes to the reader's understanding of the topic. The image's omission from the Swami Vivekananda article itself means that this is not clear. Grandiose (me, talk, contribs) 09:48, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • The image is recently uploaded and I have not got an opportunity to add the image there, since sub-articles of that article are being planned in this moment like Swami Vivekananda in London, Swami Vivekananda in California etc. I want to see those issues setlled at first. If needed I can add the image there. --TitoDutta 09:56, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • That makes sense- I think this nomination is a little premature. When you have the image securely placed in an article where it is adding value, then the image could be nominated here. J Milburn (talk) 10:23, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per Crisco (for now). J Milburn (talk) 09:17, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose until such time as encyclopedic value of this image is fixed (i.e. it is stable in a more pertinent article). Still curious about the lighting as well. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:09, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - Per Above. Highlights being burnt out rules it out for me. JFitch (talk) 23:22, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 09:24, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]